the constitution was compleated in 1776
by the end of the convention, 39 delegates signed the constitution.
';abridging'; is the term used for combinong efforts in order to get a unified and agreed upon result
the right to peaceably assemble is found in the first amendment.
a hospital would be included in the public saftey serviceTrue or false history questions?
The Declaration of Independence was completed in 1776. Agreeing on a constitution took quite a bit more time. If you remember, after the Revolution the colonies were ';united'; in the Articles of Confederation, which was unpopular with everyone. I believe the Constitution was passed in 1789.
Friday, February 12, 2010
True or false : The Red Sox won't play at Fenway again until 2008?
True - had the same thought last night...........True or false : The Red Sox won't play at Fenway again until 2008?
False. They'll lose Game 6.True or false : The Red Sox won't play at Fenway again until 2008?
we shall see when they play the games, it really hasn't been decided yet, lets just watch the series and see how it goes. That would be an ideal situation for some but lets just see.
False....................... they are going to play 5 more games there
They came back on my Yankees in 2004! Why are you counting them out.....I'm not!.....';it aint over till its over';....but still....GO YANKEES! STINKIN RED SOX!
true
False!!!! Easy question!
False they Will play game six at Fenway,remember pal this ain't over o.k.
False - the ALCS is 4 games out of 7 - the only way that could be true is if Cleveland, and had won all of the games so far, and wins tonight. The Red Sox won the first game in Boston, so they will play at least one more game in Fenway, even if they lose tonight. [Go Indians!]
I hope its true but I doubt it.
False, I believe they can bring it back but in a losing fashion. Doesnt matter anyway with the way Colorado is playing.
hey legendat...if we win tonight in cleveland, we can clinch in cleveland thursday. remeber theres 2 more games in c town. tonights and thursdays... will we win tonight and thurs.. i hope but realistically bostons tough and that may be hard to do...
Sad but true
True.
Downtown Cleveland will be a madhouse on Thursday night and I will probably not be making it to work on Friday morning.
If you were a true fan you would say false. The Indians have only won 2, Give the Red Sox a chance to come back!
False, even if Indians win tonight, game 5 will be at Fenway. Stupid question.
False. They'll lose Game 6.True or false : The Red Sox won't play at Fenway again until 2008?
we shall see when they play the games, it really hasn't been decided yet, lets just watch the series and see how it goes. That would be an ideal situation for some but lets just see.
False....................... they are going to play 5 more games there
They came back on my Yankees in 2004! Why are you counting them out.....I'm not!.....';it aint over till its over';....but still....GO YANKEES! STINKIN RED SOX!
true
False!!!! Easy question!
False they Will play game six at Fenway,remember pal this ain't over o.k.
False - the ALCS is 4 games out of 7 - the only way that could be true is if Cleveland, and had won all of the games so far, and wins tonight. The Red Sox won the first game in Boston, so they will play at least one more game in Fenway, even if they lose tonight. [Go Indians!]
I hope its true but I doubt it.
False, I believe they can bring it back but in a losing fashion. Doesnt matter anyway with the way Colorado is playing.
hey legendat...if we win tonight in cleveland, we can clinch in cleveland thursday. remeber theres 2 more games in c town. tonights and thursdays... will we win tonight and thurs.. i hope but realistically bostons tough and that may be hard to do...
Sad but true
True.
Downtown Cleveland will be a madhouse on Thursday night and I will probably not be making it to work on Friday morning.
If you were a true fan you would say false. The Indians have only won 2, Give the Red Sox a chance to come back!
False, even if Indians win tonight, game 5 will be at Fenway. Stupid question.
TRUE OR FALSE: Money can't buy happiness but it can provide comfort; however, greed will only lead to misery?
This is the most true statement in the world. I was born into wealth and was lucky enough to earn a very good amount of money on my own. I have learned that money is not the key to happiness, God, family and friends are. Money CANNOT buy love or happiness. People who think it can are so wrong. I think I am happy because I know that everything I have I owe to God and know that I have to continue to give back each and everyday. I take absolutely nothing for granted.
Peace, Love %26amp; HappinessTRUE OR FALSE: Money can't buy happiness but it can provide comfort; however, greed will only lead to misery?
TRUE
I have a few ';wealthy miserable friends';
and I watch the greedy ones, as they go broke, and loose
all friends, and hope for happiness!TRUE OR FALSE: Money can't buy happiness but it can provide comfort; however, greed will only lead to misery?
I don't care to, much for money
Money can't buy me love
Can't buy me love
Everybody tells me so
Can't buy me love
NO NO NO NO NO!!!
part one is true, part two is false, because life is unfair. Bad people sometimes win in the game of life!
totally true, Sylvester
Very true. I don't know one very rich and totally happy person, and prolly never will..
True, true. The way of the world in a nutshell.
That is true
True
(:
true
true
true
true!
true.
that is very true.
false.
I totally agree with you on thatloan
Peace, Love %26amp; HappinessTRUE OR FALSE: Money can't buy happiness but it can provide comfort; however, greed will only lead to misery?
TRUE
I have a few ';wealthy miserable friends';
and I watch the greedy ones, as they go broke, and loose
all friends, and hope for happiness!TRUE OR FALSE: Money can't buy happiness but it can provide comfort; however, greed will only lead to misery?
I don't care to, much for money
Money can't buy me love
Can't buy me love
Everybody tells me so
Can't buy me love
NO NO NO NO NO!!!
part one is true, part two is false, because life is unfair. Bad people sometimes win in the game of life!
totally true, Sylvester
Very true. I don't know one very rich and totally happy person, and prolly never will..
True, true. The way of the world in a nutshell.
That is true
True
(:
true
true
true
true!
true.
that is very true.
false.
I totally agree with you on that
True or False> The Earth's rotation is the main cause of the formation of ocean waves.?
Please answer fast! thank you!!!True or False%26gt; The Earth's rotation is the main cause of the formation of ocean waves.?
false
Waves and wind
How wind causes water to form waves is easy to understand although many intricate details still lack a satisfactory theory. On a perfectly calm sea, the wind has practically no grip. As it slides over the water surface film, it makes it move. As the water moves, it forms eddies and small ripples. Ironically, these ripples do not travel exactly in the direction of the wind but as two sets of parallel ripples, at angles 70-80潞 to the wind direction. The ripples make the water's surface rough, giving the wind a better grip. The ripples, starting at a minimum wave speed of 0.23 m/s, grow to wavelets and start to travel in the direction of the wind. At wind speeds of 4-6 knots (7-11 km/hr), these double wave fronts travel at about 30潞 from the wind. The surface still looks glassy overall but as the wind speed increases, the wavelets become high enough to interact with the air flow and the surface starts to look rough. The wind becomes turbulent just above the surface and starts transferring energy to the waves. Strong winds are more turbulent and make waves more easily.
The rougher the water becomes, the easier it is for the wind to transfer its energy. The waves become steep and choppy. Further away from the shore, the water's surface is not only stirred by the wind but also by waves arriving with the wind. These waves influence the motion of the water particles such that opposing movements gradually cancel out, whereas synchronising movements are enhanced. The waves start to become more rounded and harmonious. Depending on duration and distance (fetch), the waves develop into a fully developed sea.
Anyone familiar with the sea, knows that waves never assume a uniform, harmonious shape. Even when the wind has blown strictly from one direction only, the resulting water movement is made up of various waves, each with a different speed and height. Although some waves are small, most waves have a certain height and sometimes a wave occurs which is much higher.True or False%26gt; The Earth's rotation is the main cause of the formation of ocean waves.?
False.
Wind is the largest contributor.
false.
false
Waves and wind
How wind causes water to form waves is easy to understand although many intricate details still lack a satisfactory theory. On a perfectly calm sea, the wind has practically no grip. As it slides over the water surface film, it makes it move. As the water moves, it forms eddies and small ripples. Ironically, these ripples do not travel exactly in the direction of the wind but as two sets of parallel ripples, at angles 70-80潞 to the wind direction. The ripples make the water's surface rough, giving the wind a better grip. The ripples, starting at a minimum wave speed of 0.23 m/s, grow to wavelets and start to travel in the direction of the wind. At wind speeds of 4-6 knots (7-11 km/hr), these double wave fronts travel at about 30潞 from the wind. The surface still looks glassy overall but as the wind speed increases, the wavelets become high enough to interact with the air flow and the surface starts to look rough. The wind becomes turbulent just above the surface and starts transferring energy to the waves. Strong winds are more turbulent and make waves more easily.
The rougher the water becomes, the easier it is for the wind to transfer its energy. The waves become steep and choppy. Further away from the shore, the water's surface is not only stirred by the wind but also by waves arriving with the wind. These waves influence the motion of the water particles such that opposing movements gradually cancel out, whereas synchronising movements are enhanced. The waves start to become more rounded and harmonious. Depending on duration and distance (fetch), the waves develop into a fully developed sea.
Anyone familiar with the sea, knows that waves never assume a uniform, harmonious shape. Even when the wind has blown strictly from one direction only, the resulting water movement is made up of various waves, each with a different speed and height. Although some waves are small, most waves have a certain height and sometimes a wave occurs which is much higher.True or False%26gt; The Earth's rotation is the main cause of the formation of ocean waves.?
False.
Wind is the largest contributor.
false.
True or False: You've spent at least $20 today?
true. exactly $20 on a fat dub sack. hahhaTrue or False: You've spent at least $20 today?
false i made at least 20 dollars todayTrue or False: You've spent at least $20 today?
False
True
False
False.
False.
False, spent no more than 8.
LOL yeah thats safe to say.
False, i spent $0 today :)
True, I spent $200 :O
false
false
false
true
False; I've only spent $2 today
True. I spent like $50 on clothes.
False, I've spent none.
true 38.00 on nothing
false.
False i stay home
False, I stayed home.
false i made money
false...i have spent nothing, i have not left my house today nor have i made any online purchases
false i made at least 20 dollars todayTrue or False: You've spent at least $20 today?
False
True
False
False.
False.
False, spent no more than 8.
LOL yeah thats safe to say.
False, i spent $0 today :)
True, I spent $200 :O
false
false
false
true
False; I've only spent $2 today
True. I spent like $50 on clothes.
False, I've spent none.
true 38.00 on nothing
false.
False i stay home
False, I stayed home.
false i made money
false...i have spent nothing, i have not left my house today nor have i made any online purchases
True or false:if p(x) is a polynomial, then?
if p(x) is a polynomial, then the function f(x)=p(x)/(x-1) has a vertical asymptote at x=1True or false:if p(x) is a polynomial, then?
False. The function doesn鈥檛 exist for x-1.True or false:if p(x) is a polynomial, then?
Not necessarily. p(x) could be x-1 or something multiplied by that binomial. There wouldn't be an asymptote there, but rather, a removable discontinuity there (a hole).
true.
False. The function doesn鈥檛 exist for x-1.True or false:if p(x) is a polynomial, then?
Not necessarily. p(x) could be x-1 or something multiplied by that binomial. There wouldn't be an asymptote there, but rather, a removable discontinuity there (a hole).
true.
Do king charles need a special diet,people have told me to avoid all meat forms,is this true or false,many tha?
i own a king charles and he doesn't have a special diet. We buy him the pedigree senior as he is really old but you can get pedigree puppy and pedigree adult and i think a few more. It is a yellow bag:
http://www.feedem.co.uk/dog-2/dog-food-1鈥?/a>
You can get pouches and cans aswel but mine prefers dry. The only special requirment for these dogs is to feed them pedigree food, a lot of the other stuff can make them ill. Roast cicken and rice is what we also feed my dog for a special dinner!!
Hope i helped!
X
JORDAN S - My king charles is 14 in december and is showing no signs of kicking the bucket!!Do king charles need a special diet,people have told me to avoid all meat forms,is this true or false,many tha?
Wow, their dogs probably won't live past 12. Anyways, if your dog does come down with some allergy, salmon-based dog food is the best. Most vegetarian owners anxious to get their dogs on a cruelty-free diet, will find out their dog is allergic to chicken and automatically switch to a vegan kibble when they haven't even tried venison,duck,fish,or lamb, saying that their dog is allergic to meat.
I feed my dog Innova EVO small bites. Perfect. High in protein and low in carbs.Do king charles need a special diet,people have told me to avoid all meat forms,is this true or false,many tha?
for ALL dogs, you want to look at the first 10 ingredients specifically, in all dog foods... this makes up 80% of the food's content. The first and foremost ingredients should be MEAT. (Make sure it says a specific meat, ex: Chicken, Lamb, Turkey.)
You want to avoid WHEAT and CORN as many dogs have allergies to these two items, and they are do not meet the dog's nutritional needs, but are simply a filler.
Also avoid ';Bi-products'; This means it is not muscle, but the feathers, beak, feet etc. of the animal.
';Gluten'; is the product that was in the news not too long ago, it is to be avoided as well. Your best bet is to NOT buy your dog food at the grocery store, but go to a pet shop and read ingredients. I like ';Blue Diamond'; brand from PetSmart personally but there are a lot to pick from.
Some dogs are allergic to various foods just like some people. King Charles Spaniels are no more likely to be allergic to meat than any other breed of dog.
Here are two Web pages for national clubs. Neither mention anything about needing a meat free diet. They do mention a variety of potential health issues that good breeders are trying to breed out of their lines. The people you have talked to are clearly badly misinformed. I would take anything else they told you with a giant grain of salt! You will be able to find a reputable breeder on these sites and lots of good information about the breed as well.
http://www.ckcsc.org/
http://www.ackcsc.org/
King Charles are a breed of dog. A dog eats meat.
However some dogs in any breed, or a mutt, can sometimes need a special diet. But that's not down to the type of dog, it's down to the possible special needs of the individual dog (is that English?)
So what you have been told is false lol.
Try him on small amounts of food first, Hills is a very good one and it was recommended to me by my vet. Sometimes dry is better than wet but it is up to you. Just don't over feed him.
What!!?? Sorry, It's absolute rubbish!
Dogs are carnivores first and foremost, they need meat as their principle and main food source.
Feeding dogs anything else is animal cruelty in my opinion.
Dogs are carnivore. They eat meat. Feed a high quality kibble and keep the vaccinations to a minimum and you'll be fine.
Your dog is a descendant of the wolf, of course he eats meat. All dogs are carnivores.
no, dogs eat meat. not just certain kinds of dogs. all dogs eat meat.
It's false. Normal dog food is perfectly fine for him.
Is a King Charles like a Prince Albert?
http://www.feedem.co.uk/dog-2/dog-food-1鈥?/a>
You can get pouches and cans aswel but mine prefers dry. The only special requirment for these dogs is to feed them pedigree food, a lot of the other stuff can make them ill. Roast cicken and rice is what we also feed my dog for a special dinner!!
Hope i helped!
X
JORDAN S - My king charles is 14 in december and is showing no signs of kicking the bucket!!Do king charles need a special diet,people have told me to avoid all meat forms,is this true or false,many tha?
Wow, their dogs probably won't live past 12. Anyways, if your dog does come down with some allergy, salmon-based dog food is the best. Most vegetarian owners anxious to get their dogs on a cruelty-free diet, will find out their dog is allergic to chicken and automatically switch to a vegan kibble when they haven't even tried venison,duck,fish,or lamb, saying that their dog is allergic to meat.
I feed my dog Innova EVO small bites. Perfect. High in protein and low in carbs.Do king charles need a special diet,people have told me to avoid all meat forms,is this true or false,many tha?
for ALL dogs, you want to look at the first 10 ingredients specifically, in all dog foods... this makes up 80% of the food's content. The first and foremost ingredients should be MEAT. (Make sure it says a specific meat, ex: Chicken, Lamb, Turkey.)
You want to avoid WHEAT and CORN as many dogs have allergies to these two items, and they are do not meet the dog's nutritional needs, but are simply a filler.
Also avoid ';Bi-products'; This means it is not muscle, but the feathers, beak, feet etc. of the animal.
';Gluten'; is the product that was in the news not too long ago, it is to be avoided as well. Your best bet is to NOT buy your dog food at the grocery store, but go to a pet shop and read ingredients. I like ';Blue Diamond'; brand from PetSmart personally but there are a lot to pick from.
Some dogs are allergic to various foods just like some people. King Charles Spaniels are no more likely to be allergic to meat than any other breed of dog.
Here are two Web pages for national clubs. Neither mention anything about needing a meat free diet. They do mention a variety of potential health issues that good breeders are trying to breed out of their lines. The people you have talked to are clearly badly misinformed. I would take anything else they told you with a giant grain of salt! You will be able to find a reputable breeder on these sites and lots of good information about the breed as well.
http://www.ckcsc.org/
http://www.ackcsc.org/
King Charles are a breed of dog. A dog eats meat.
However some dogs in any breed, or a mutt, can sometimes need a special diet. But that's not down to the type of dog, it's down to the possible special needs of the individual dog (is that English?)
So what you have been told is false lol.
Try him on small amounts of food first, Hills is a very good one and it was recommended to me by my vet. Sometimes dry is better than wet but it is up to you. Just don't over feed him.
What!!?? Sorry, It's absolute rubbish!
Dogs are carnivores first and foremost, they need meat as their principle and main food source.
Feeding dogs anything else is animal cruelty in my opinion.
Dogs are carnivore. They eat meat. Feed a high quality kibble and keep the vaccinations to a minimum and you'll be fine.
Your dog is a descendant of the wolf, of course he eats meat. All dogs are carnivores.
no, dogs eat meat. not just certain kinds of dogs. all dogs eat meat.
It's false. Normal dog food is perfectly fine for him.
Is a King Charles like a Prince Albert?
If humans are in the same class as domestic cats we must also be in the same order true or false? explain?
False.
In the system of zoological classification, Class is higher level of categorization than Order.
Both cats and humans are in the Class Mammalia, meaning they are both tetrapod vertebrates that have hair or fur, and nourish their young with milk produced by mammary glands on the female. There are also other similarities, such as a single lower jaw bone (mandible), and three inner ear bones.
These traits separate them from other Classes of Vertebrata, such as amphibians, reptiles and birds.
After that, though, there are many different Orders of mammal.
Cats are in Order Carnivora, characterized by the possession of a pair of blade-like shearing teeth known as the carnassials, formed by the upper 4th premolar and lower 1st molar on each side.
Humans are in Order Primates, which also includes lemurs, tarsiers, monkeys and the other great apes.If humans are in the same class as domestic cats we must also be in the same order true or false? explain?
I think true, if an order goes before class..
i.e.
Order:
Class:
or something. So, if we are in the Mammalia order, so are cats. They give live birth, feed their offspring milk, and are relativly... not as far off as an alligator would be.
In the system of zoological classification, Class is higher level of categorization than Order.
Both cats and humans are in the Class Mammalia, meaning they are both tetrapod vertebrates that have hair or fur, and nourish their young with milk produced by mammary glands on the female. There are also other similarities, such as a single lower jaw bone (mandible), and three inner ear bones.
These traits separate them from other Classes of Vertebrata, such as amphibians, reptiles and birds.
After that, though, there are many different Orders of mammal.
Cats are in Order Carnivora, characterized by the possession of a pair of blade-like shearing teeth known as the carnassials, formed by the upper 4th premolar and lower 1st molar on each side.
Humans are in Order Primates, which also includes lemurs, tarsiers, monkeys and the other great apes.If humans are in the same class as domestic cats we must also be in the same order true or false? explain?
I think true, if an order goes before class..
i.e.
Order:
Class:
or something. So, if we are in the Mammalia order, so are cats. They give live birth, feed their offspring milk, and are relativly... not as far off as an alligator would be.
True or False. Gases are the least dense of the three states of matter.?
TRUE.
Solids are the most dense, then liquids, and gases are the least dense.True or False. Gases are the least dense of the three states of matter.?
FALSE. Plasma is the least dense state of matter.True or False. Gases are the least dense of the three states of matter.?
True.
yes of couse,or you will be dead if air is not.
duhloan
Solids are the most dense, then liquids, and gases are the least dense.True or False. Gases are the least dense of the three states of matter.?
FALSE. Plasma is the least dense state of matter.True or False. Gases are the least dense of the three states of matter.?
True.
yes of couse,or you will be dead if air is not.
duh
True or False: Raisin in Champagne!?
Is it true that a raisin dropped in a glass of fresh champagne will bounce up and down continuously from the bottom of the glass to the top?
I need to know!
=)True or False: Raisin in Champagne!?
Yep. The raisin normally doesn't float but the bubbles in the champagne stick to it and carry it to the top. Then the bubbles pop and it drops back down. You can do it with other bubbly liquids but which ones work completely depends on their density.True or False: Raisin in Champagne!?
yes but why put raisian in champagne, im sure it don't taste good.
Why not test it yourself?
yes
I need to know!
=)True or False: Raisin in Champagne!?
Yep. The raisin normally doesn't float but the bubbles in the champagne stick to it and carry it to the top. Then the bubbles pop and it drops back down. You can do it with other bubbly liquids but which ones work completely depends on their density.True or False: Raisin in Champagne!?
yes but why put raisian in champagne, im sure it don't taste good.
Why not test it yourself?
yes
True or False: ';Who Let the Dogs Out';, is a useless turd of a song?
From the minute I first heard it 20 thousand years ago I thought the same thing as you, what the hell kinda stupid song is this? It blows....True or False: ';Who Let the Dogs Out';, is a useless turd of a song?
it was good when it first came out..
now its just like a funny song.True or False: ';Who Let the Dogs Out';, is a useless turd of a song?
i agree with EAGLES FAN
I thinks its a pretty cool song
aww no it makes me happy=)
OPERATION GOLDEN EAGLE: PHASE 2- JERUSALEM SIEGE
*OROMIS DIES!!! THANKS TO GALBY!!!
*GALBY IS STRONG CAUSE HE LEECH SEEDS DRAGON HEART OF HEARTS
*DRAGONS ARE NOT EXTINCT
*BROM IS ERAGON鈥橲 FATHER
*ERAGON GETS NEW SWORD CALLED BRINSINGR
*SLOAN IS SENT TO ELVES AND BARRED FROM MEETING DAUGHTER FOR REST OF LIFE
*NASUADA CHALLENGES HER MOM鈥橲 COUISIN TO EMO FEST
*ELVA KEEPS HER POWER
*SELENA IS ABLACK HAND
*MURTAGH AND ERAGON FIGHT AGAIN AND LOSES
Cult of Herostratus
...
Depends who you're describing as a 'dog'.
No, it's funny and part of our culture. Even old guys say it. We even hear, ';Who Let the Cats Out?'; Meow, Meow, Meow. Meow.
True
whooo let the dogs out?
That brings back memories ((:
bahaha
Oh no....i used to sing along to it when it came out...:)
loved the rug-rats too.lol.
who, who, who, who, who?:D
TRUE...
True~
True.
yes yes yes yes
Oh my gosh! The song is so silly, but when my oldest son was little we used to sing ';Who let NateDawg out?'; He was only about 8 months old or so and would laugh at us like crazy.
Although it is true...you have to admit it is fun to sing to...and we use it at school when the students are ';out of control.'; :)
fAlSE.
no such thing as a song like that, theres a reason for everything. :)
I've heard a lot worse, and besides, my dogs really liked it.
false...i like that song ^ ^
I wouldn't go so far as ';turd';, but yes, the song sucks!
ur jus jealous :{
i love that song x
true - i hate it
that song is allright
true...........lol
idc its good............ neither
its a song for the movie rugrats so it has a point
Did you just now start to think this or 10 years ago when it came out?
true
True
I thought it was about who let the ugly women out in a party. No joke. Other than that yeah.
it was good when it first came out..
now its just like a funny song.True or False: ';Who Let the Dogs Out';, is a useless turd of a song?
i agree with EAGLES FAN
I thinks its a pretty cool song
aww no it makes me happy=)
OPERATION GOLDEN EAGLE: PHASE 2- JERUSALEM SIEGE
*OROMIS DIES!!! THANKS TO GALBY!!!
*GALBY IS STRONG CAUSE HE LEECH SEEDS DRAGON HEART OF HEARTS
*DRAGONS ARE NOT EXTINCT
*BROM IS ERAGON鈥橲 FATHER
*ERAGON GETS NEW SWORD CALLED BRINSINGR
*SLOAN IS SENT TO ELVES AND BARRED FROM MEETING DAUGHTER FOR REST OF LIFE
*NASUADA CHALLENGES HER MOM鈥橲 COUISIN TO EMO FEST
*ELVA KEEPS HER POWER
*SELENA IS ABLACK HAND
*MURTAGH AND ERAGON FIGHT AGAIN AND LOSES
Cult of Herostratus
...
Depends who you're describing as a 'dog'.
No, it's funny and part of our culture. Even old guys say it. We even hear, ';Who Let the Cats Out?'; Meow, Meow, Meow. Meow.
True
whooo let the dogs out?
That brings back memories ((:
bahaha
Oh no....i used to sing along to it when it came out...:)
loved the rug-rats too.lol.
who, who, who, who, who?:D
TRUE...
True~
True.
yes yes yes yes
Oh my gosh! The song is so silly, but when my oldest son was little we used to sing ';Who let NateDawg out?'; He was only about 8 months old or so and would laugh at us like crazy.
Although it is true...you have to admit it is fun to sing to...and we use it at school when the students are ';out of control.'; :)
fAlSE.
no such thing as a song like that, theres a reason for everything. :)
I've heard a lot worse, and besides, my dogs really liked it.
false...i like that song ^ ^
I wouldn't go so far as ';turd';, but yes, the song sucks!
ur jus jealous :{
i love that song x
true - i hate it
that song is allright
true...........lol
idc its good............ neither
its a song for the movie rugrats so it has a point
Did you just now start to think this or 10 years ago when it came out?
true
True
I thought it was about who let the ugly women out in a party. No joke. Other than that yeah.
True or False: There has been a double standard in your relationship?
If true, share your experience please.
Like your lover don't want you to do something but they think it's ok for them to do it.True or False: There has been a double standard in your relationship?
Very true.
Sorry but it's a bit too personal to share with everyone.True or False: There has been a double standard in your relationship?
False.
Like your lover don't want you to do something but they think it's ok for them to do it.True or False: There has been a double standard in your relationship?
Very true.
Sorry but it's a bit too personal to share with everyone.True or False: There has been a double standard in your relationship?
False.
True or False Age ain't nothin but a number?
hmmm?True or False Age ain't nothin but a number?
Very true ..!!
To me age doesn't matters ...!!!
~~ 18 Till i die ~~True or False Age ain't nothin but a number?
Age is how long you have been alive
how you feel has nothing to do with it. You can feel 900 when you get up or go to bed after a long day or you can feel like a kid when you are having a good day. So yes to a point i think age is just a number. It is all in how you percieve it individaully.
False. Age is maturity, immaturity, wisdom, being unwise, experience, inexperience, innocence, and corruptness. Age is way more than just a number.
Hi again:) It's false. When I became desperately ill I found that age is age and it sucks but sure beats the alternative!
yah... the number is 15 will get you 20
itsonly a number if the lowest number is above the age of consent
False.. i am charatirized by my age everyday of my life. jsut because of it they think i'm annoying. :O
age depends on the age of heart and not body...if heart is week no matter how much you are young you will feel old.
False it indicates your maturity level most likely too. Chicha
heck yah its true. you are as old as you feel. I will be 34 in 14 more days and I feel like im 16.
that goes along with ';mind over matter'; so like whatever you believe you are. and im an idealist so id like to believe that.
True for me
The only thing age represents is experience.
no because it comes with restrictions due to the law, such as a 18 with a 15 year old=rape, cops dont just see the #
False as HELL! Would you think it's okay for a 16 year old to have sex eith a 2 yer old?
true in some cases, false in others...in other words, it depends on the person
usually false
true to the person but false to the law
technically true, only on paper.
completely false.
false its an important factor...
No, there's a big difference between a 5 year old and a 35 year old.
Very true..Least when it comes to maturity,just cause your young does not mean you lack it,just cause your old does not mean you have any..
It's true
In a sense of maturity.
I'm 15, and maturity is not an issue.
Also I learned from other peoples life experience, and live truth.
Of course this doesn't stop anyone from judging me on the spot, but I'm ok with it now. It's almost amusing.
As for pretty ricky, I wouldn't listen to them haha.
The sound like pedophiles
True.
True.
ofcourse it is true age is nothing but a number
false
true
If you're both legal...
Truth
For me.. it's true
True
But that's what old people say to make themselves feel better.
Very true ..!!
To me age doesn't matters ...!!!
~~ 18 Till i die ~~True or False Age ain't nothin but a number?
Age is how long you have been alive
how you feel has nothing to do with it. You can feel 900 when you get up or go to bed after a long day or you can feel like a kid when you are having a good day. So yes to a point i think age is just a number. It is all in how you percieve it individaully.
False. Age is maturity, immaturity, wisdom, being unwise, experience, inexperience, innocence, and corruptness. Age is way more than just a number.
Hi again:) It's false. When I became desperately ill I found that age is age and it sucks but sure beats the alternative!
yah... the number is 15 will get you 20
itsonly a number if the lowest number is above the age of consent
False.. i am charatirized by my age everyday of my life. jsut because of it they think i'm annoying. :O
age depends on the age of heart and not body...if heart is week no matter how much you are young you will feel old.
False it indicates your maturity level most likely too. Chicha
heck yah its true. you are as old as you feel. I will be 34 in 14 more days and I feel like im 16.
that goes along with ';mind over matter'; so like whatever you believe you are. and im an idealist so id like to believe that.
True for me
The only thing age represents is experience.
no because it comes with restrictions due to the law, such as a 18 with a 15 year old=rape, cops dont just see the #
False as HELL! Would you think it's okay for a 16 year old to have sex eith a 2 yer old?
true in some cases, false in others...in other words, it depends on the person
usually false
true to the person but false to the law
technically true, only on paper.
completely false.
false its an important factor...
No, there's a big difference between a 5 year old and a 35 year old.
Very true..Least when it comes to maturity,just cause your young does not mean you lack it,just cause your old does not mean you have any..
It's true
In a sense of maturity.
I'm 15, and maturity is not an issue.
Also I learned from other peoples life experience, and live truth.
Of course this doesn't stop anyone from judging me on the spot, but I'm ok with it now. It's almost amusing.
As for pretty ricky, I wouldn't listen to them haha.
The sound like pedophiles
True.
True.
ofcourse it is true age is nothing but a number
false
true
If you're both legal...
Truth
For me.. it's true
True
But that's what old people say to make themselves feel better.
True or False: GIRLS! If you consider a guy to be just a friend, he can never be your BF?
GIRLS~
If you consider a guy to be just a friend (NOT Date material) at first, can he ever become ';date-able'; later as you get to know him better?
OR
If a guy is put into a FRIENDS category, he can never escape?
(...all this is according to the laddertheory)True or False: GIRLS! If you consider a guy to be just a friend, he can never be your BF?
FALSE: sometimes when we at first find a guy to be a great friend, but we're not interested in dating, we may get to know him better over time and fall for him, finding interest later.
Not in every case of course, but it can happen.True or False: GIRLS! If you consider a guy to be just a friend, he can never be your BF?
The Ladder Theory is half bull ****.
It is possible for a guy to be ';just a friend'; and then possibly be date-able as I get to know him. I have had plenty of friends who were just friends and then began to date. All girls are different, you're lucky if you meet a girl like this.
For me, it's different. When I meet a guy, there's period for me to decided whether or not he's date-able. For example, the way he dresses, way he speaks, what kind of personality, way he acts, etc. If there's multiple things I don't like, he's automatically a friend - but that doesn't mean that there isn't a chance of me falling for him down the line - the chance is just slim.
If I decide he's in the middle or that I like him as a person, he goes in the maybe ';ladder';. There might be things I find out about him later one that I might dislike, therefore he goes into the friend ladder. There may be things I like about him which obviously will make me think he's even a greater potential boyfriend.
The ladders are not set in stone and guys are easily shifted from one ladder to the other. So yes, the Ladder Theory has holes and I believe to be made up solely for entertainment purposes.
False.
I was surprised myself that after a number of years of having had a very good friend, I began, or rather we began to console one another about what had been a few romantic failures and saw within one another the possibility of falling in love, as w if we had been for a time, yet never had troubled to look at each other romantically. We plan to marry in May of this year.
I believe that before him, I'd always been looking for that person whose great challenge to my personality was what cause sparks and fireworks...now I understand that I had been searching for people who were emotionally unavailable. Perhaps I was unavailable as well...
no, that's not true...Friendship is the very step to have intimate relationship... Which means, thru this friendship you may know the person more...Because of constant being together and communication, sometimes unintentionally you got fall from each other...
It would be nice that the ultimate relationship started from friendship because this means that there would be much adjustment to carry or the two of you are comfortable to each other already that you don't have to pretend to be what you want to be for impression purposes because you partner already knows your weaknesses and strength...
1/2 true 1/2 false
A girl can put a guy into just frends but never gonna date him but later on want to date him. No u can escape the just friends category if u play ur cards right. Like on Vday if i dont have a date and he asks me out and ive kinda liked him then bye bye friends hello boyfriends category but u have to remember u can get out of that one too im just not gonna tell u how
Friendship is the best basis for marriage! Period!
If you have already established a friendship with a guy, he won't hurt your feelings as easily as a casual relationship and when you marry, that same theory will apply!
My husband and I had the friendship first and we were married nearly 22 years until his death.
Im a guy, and that is not true, I know for a fact.
All those cheesy websites that say don't do that, is made up of a 100 nerds who have never gotten a girl so they make dumb advice for others.
Listen to someone who actually know what their talking about.
Remeber anything is possible. ;)
Good Luck
well, i considered this guy to be only my very close friend, and 4 months earlier, he asked me out, and i realized that i actually liked him quite a lot, which i wouldnt have ever thought of, and now weve been going out ever since. so, yeah, girls can change their minds.
i kno im not a girl, but i've seen it happen with my friends, people that knew each other for along time then start dating. altho it seems to happen with people who are jus casual acquaintances, so maybe the person has changed into something they like next time they see them
you can have a guy best friend if he is gay....you cannot have a true guy best friend without having some ';feelings'; involved. some may not like to admit it...but there is always a little sexual tension that is present.
That's not true. Many people that I have known have had guy friends that they have initially only seen as friends, but over time and closer friendships with them have grown into actual romantic relationships.
False...he can become ';date-able';, and yeah he can escape into the ';friends with benefits'; category!
I was best friends with a guy for 5.5 years. Then suddenly he started looking better and better to me, we fell in love and last year passed our 10 year wedding anniversary.
Well guys always wanna have girlfriends and it really hard to find one that is JUST a friend.I had the luck only in 4th grade and then nothing..they all were date materials ...
false-
overtime we might realize we like the friend in another way and they can become dateable
it can work because as you get lyk older n what not you get more mature and fall for lyk mostly mates
FALSE...
If a friend plays his cards right... he will be tapping that before too long.
nooooooooooooooooooooooooo
not true
Sure, but if you see him as a friend there was no attraction to begin with. xox
false
not true...
If you consider a guy to be just a friend (NOT Date material) at first, can he ever become ';date-able'; later as you get to know him better?
OR
If a guy is put into a FRIENDS category, he can never escape?
(...all this is according to the laddertheory)True or False: GIRLS! If you consider a guy to be just a friend, he can never be your BF?
FALSE: sometimes when we at first find a guy to be a great friend, but we're not interested in dating, we may get to know him better over time and fall for him, finding interest later.
Not in every case of course, but it can happen.True or False: GIRLS! If you consider a guy to be just a friend, he can never be your BF?
The Ladder Theory is half bull ****.
It is possible for a guy to be ';just a friend'; and then possibly be date-able as I get to know him. I have had plenty of friends who were just friends and then began to date. All girls are different, you're lucky if you meet a girl like this.
For me, it's different. When I meet a guy, there's period for me to decided whether or not he's date-able. For example, the way he dresses, way he speaks, what kind of personality, way he acts, etc. If there's multiple things I don't like, he's automatically a friend - but that doesn't mean that there isn't a chance of me falling for him down the line - the chance is just slim.
If I decide he's in the middle or that I like him as a person, he goes in the maybe ';ladder';. There might be things I find out about him later one that I might dislike, therefore he goes into the friend ladder. There may be things I like about him which obviously will make me think he's even a greater potential boyfriend.
The ladders are not set in stone and guys are easily shifted from one ladder to the other. So yes, the Ladder Theory has holes and I believe to be made up solely for entertainment purposes.
False.
I was surprised myself that after a number of years of having had a very good friend, I began, or rather we began to console one another about what had been a few romantic failures and saw within one another the possibility of falling in love, as w if we had been for a time, yet never had troubled to look at each other romantically. We plan to marry in May of this year.
I believe that before him, I'd always been looking for that person whose great challenge to my personality was what cause sparks and fireworks...now I understand that I had been searching for people who were emotionally unavailable. Perhaps I was unavailable as well...
no, that's not true...Friendship is the very step to have intimate relationship... Which means, thru this friendship you may know the person more...Because of constant being together and communication, sometimes unintentionally you got fall from each other...
It would be nice that the ultimate relationship started from friendship because this means that there would be much adjustment to carry or the two of you are comfortable to each other already that you don't have to pretend to be what you want to be for impression purposes because you partner already knows your weaknesses and strength...
1/2 true 1/2 false
A girl can put a guy into just frends but never gonna date him but later on want to date him. No u can escape the just friends category if u play ur cards right. Like on Vday if i dont have a date and he asks me out and ive kinda liked him then bye bye friends hello boyfriends category but u have to remember u can get out of that one too im just not gonna tell u how
Friendship is the best basis for marriage! Period!
If you have already established a friendship with a guy, he won't hurt your feelings as easily as a casual relationship and when you marry, that same theory will apply!
My husband and I had the friendship first and we were married nearly 22 years until his death.
Im a guy, and that is not true, I know for a fact.
All those cheesy websites that say don't do that, is made up of a 100 nerds who have never gotten a girl so they make dumb advice for others.
Listen to someone who actually know what their talking about.
Remeber anything is possible. ;)
Good Luck
well, i considered this guy to be only my very close friend, and 4 months earlier, he asked me out, and i realized that i actually liked him quite a lot, which i wouldnt have ever thought of, and now weve been going out ever since. so, yeah, girls can change their minds.
i kno im not a girl, but i've seen it happen with my friends, people that knew each other for along time then start dating. altho it seems to happen with people who are jus casual acquaintances, so maybe the person has changed into something they like next time they see them
you can have a guy best friend if he is gay....you cannot have a true guy best friend without having some ';feelings'; involved. some may not like to admit it...but there is always a little sexual tension that is present.
That's not true. Many people that I have known have had guy friends that they have initially only seen as friends, but over time and closer friendships with them have grown into actual romantic relationships.
False...he can become ';date-able';, and yeah he can escape into the ';friends with benefits'; category!
I was best friends with a guy for 5.5 years. Then suddenly he started looking better and better to me, we fell in love and last year passed our 10 year wedding anniversary.
Well guys always wanna have girlfriends and it really hard to find one that is JUST a friend.I had the luck only in 4th grade and then nothing..they all were date materials ...
false-
overtime we might realize we like the friend in another way and they can become dateable
it can work because as you get lyk older n what not you get more mature and fall for lyk mostly mates
FALSE...
If a friend plays his cards right... he will be tapping that before too long.
nooooooooooooooooooooooooo
not true
Sure, but if you see him as a friend there was no attraction to begin with. xox
false
not true...
True or false? 'a single drop of ink that makes millions to think(Lord Byron)?
A great saying It's similar to the pen is mightier than the sword.One appreciates the value of the written word in educating one self as well as the massesTrue or false? 'a single drop of ink that makes millions to think(Lord Byron)?
True, that same drop of ink can be a famous painting which has millions and millions of meanings.True or false? 'a single drop of ink that makes millions to think(Lord Byron)?
true... I think...
Very True......!!
False. There aren't 1000000 thoughts. I think.
True
I don't understand what you mean by this but a lot of these people are being jerks
trueloan
True, that same drop of ink can be a famous painting which has millions and millions of meanings.True or false? 'a single drop of ink that makes millions to think(Lord Byron)?
true... I think...
Very True......!!
False. There aren't 1000000 thoughts. I think.
True
I don't understand what you mean by this but a lot of these people are being jerks
true
TRUE OR FALSE: The second step when evaluating the expression 81+3-9+6+19 is 81+3?
If all the operations were addition, you could do them in any order. However, since subtraction is involved, you must do them in strict left-to-right order until you have completed the subtraction.
(81 + 3) - 9 + (6 + 19) is much different than (81 + 3) - (9 + 6 + 19). The first one is the way you must evaluate it, to come out with an answer of 100.
The answer to your original question is maybe, since you could evaluate the (6 + 19) first, but really, it should be false, since you should evaluate it left to right.TRUE OR FALSE: The second step when evaluating the expression 81+3-9+6+19 is 81+3?
ya, sure. it doesnt matter b/c they are all addition/subtraction. so you can just do the math straight across.TRUE OR FALSE: The second step when evaluating the expression 81+3-9+6+19 is 81+3?
This it true only if you realize that you add the ones to the equation by adding and you subtract the ones by subtracting. You can't group together the two different ones.
You can do it in any order. If you want to do 81+3 second, that's okay. Most people would do that first.
yes. in evaluating the expression like this follow the rule of BEODMAS means Bracket, Exponent, Of (multiply), Division, Multiplication, Addition and Subtraction.
this answer is false because 81+3-9+6+19=100 but 81+3=84 so 100 is not equal to 81so this answer is wrong. it's mean81+3-9+619 is 81+3.
(81 + 3) - 9 + (6 + 19) is much different than (81 + 3) - (9 + 6 + 19). The first one is the way you must evaluate it, to come out with an answer of 100.
The answer to your original question is maybe, since you could evaluate the (6 + 19) first, but really, it should be false, since you should evaluate it left to right.TRUE OR FALSE: The second step when evaluating the expression 81+3-9+6+19 is 81+3?
ya, sure. it doesnt matter b/c they are all addition/subtraction. so you can just do the math straight across.TRUE OR FALSE: The second step when evaluating the expression 81+3-9+6+19 is 81+3?
This it true only if you realize that you add the ones to the equation by adding and you subtract the ones by subtracting. You can't group together the two different ones.
You can do it in any order. If you want to do 81+3 second, that's okay. Most people would do that first.
yes. in evaluating the expression like this follow the rule of BEODMAS means Bracket, Exponent, Of (multiply), Division, Multiplication, Addition and Subtraction.
this answer is false because 81+3-9+6+19=100 but 81+3=84 so 100 is not equal to 81so this answer is wrong. it's mean81+3-9+619 is 81+3.
True or False question concerning Bankruptcy?
True or False? In the ';Northern Pipeline'; case, the United States Supreme Court held that the broad congressional grant of jurisdiction given to untenured bankruptcy judges by the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 was unconstitutional.
================
I say the answer is true because they had to choose between 'Article I'; Judges or ';Article II'; judges.True or False question concerning Bankruptcy?
True, the juridisction of the courts must be specific when conferred by law without any discretion on the part of the Executive Department to add.
================
I say the answer is true because they had to choose between 'Article I'; Judges or ';Article II'; judges.True or False question concerning Bankruptcy?
True, the juridisction of the courts must be specific when conferred by law without any discretion on the part of the Executive Department to add.
True or false: German and Japanese war production matched that of the Allied powers during World War II.?
??!! get it right and win 10 ppoints~!!True or false: German and Japanese war production matched that of the Allied powers during World War II.?
WW2 production figures
Material- Allies - Axis
Tanks and SP guns - 227,235 - 52,345
Artillery -914,682 - 180,141
Mortars -657,318 - 100,000+
Machineguns - 4,744,484 -1,058,863
Military trucks - 3,060,354 - 594,859
Military aircraft total - 633,072 - 278,795
Fighter aircraft - 212,459 - 90,684
Attack aircraft - 37,549 - 12,539
Bomber aircraft -153,615 - 35,415
Reconnaissance aircraft - 7,885 -13,033
Transport aircraft - 43,045 -5,657
Training aircraft -93,578 -28,516
Aircraft carriers -155 -16
Battleships -13 - 7
Cruisers - 82 - 15
Destroyers - 814 -86
Convoy escorts -1,102 -
Submarines -422 -1,336
See for yourself. The only thing the Axis outproduced the Allies in were submarines.True or false: German and Japanese war production matched that of the Allied powers during World War II.?
False. The Allied powers war production was much greater then the Axis.
I can give you two examples. When the Soviet army attacked Berlin in 1945, it had more artillery massed in that one sector of the front than the Nazi Army had possessed during the entire war.
A German officer who had surrendered to the Americans told them that a one Panzer could defeat ten American tanks.. ';But somehow you always had eleven.';
Between 1940 and 1945 Japan produced nearly 75,000 aircraft. The US produced nearly 300,000.
VERY FALSE
False.
True
WW2 production figures
Material- Allies - Axis
Tanks and SP guns - 227,235 - 52,345
Artillery -914,682 - 180,141
Mortars -657,318 - 100,000+
Machineguns - 4,744,484 -1,058,863
Military trucks - 3,060,354 - 594,859
Military aircraft total - 633,072 - 278,795
Fighter aircraft - 212,459 - 90,684
Attack aircraft - 37,549 - 12,539
Bomber aircraft -153,615 - 35,415
Reconnaissance aircraft - 7,885 -13,033
Transport aircraft - 43,045 -5,657
Training aircraft -93,578 -28,516
Aircraft carriers -155 -16
Battleships -13 - 7
Cruisers - 82 - 15
Destroyers - 814 -86
Convoy escorts -1,102 -
Submarines -422 -1,336
See for yourself. The only thing the Axis outproduced the Allies in were submarines.True or false: German and Japanese war production matched that of the Allied powers during World War II.?
False. The Allied powers war production was much greater then the Axis.
I can give you two examples. When the Soviet army attacked Berlin in 1945, it had more artillery massed in that one sector of the front than the Nazi Army had possessed during the entire war.
A German officer who had surrendered to the Americans told them that a one Panzer could defeat ten American tanks.. ';But somehow you always had eleven.';
Between 1940 and 1945 Japan produced nearly 75,000 aircraft. The US produced nearly 300,000.
VERY FALSE
False.
True
If a girl tongue kisses you, she likes you and definitely has feelings for you,END OF STORY!! True or false?
If a girl tongue kissed you, she must like you, but the degree of liking is unknown. She definitely has some sort of feelings, whether they are superficial or deeper, is also unknown, so I guess the answer is true. That truth is too broad to define.If a girl tongue kisses you, she likes you and definitely has feelings for you,END OF STORY!! True or false?
FALSE!!! You can tongue kiss without having feelings for them. I know from experience and my friends personal thought and feelings.If a girl tongue kisses you, she likes you and definitely has feelings for you,END OF STORY!! True or false?
False! A girl can give you tongue but not have feelings for you because she may just want to have fun or whatever other reason.
False. You can kiss anyone without having feelings for them.
false. a kiss is a kiss
if they say they like you then they do (maybe) ive said i liked sumone before but was just in the spur of the moment
False! Some girls are worse than guys and are only interested in hooking up.
not necessarily
FALSE.!
feeling in the pants
true
FALSE!!! You can tongue kiss without having feelings for them. I know from experience and my friends personal thought and feelings.If a girl tongue kisses you, she likes you and definitely has feelings for you,END OF STORY!! True or false?
False! A girl can give you tongue but not have feelings for you because she may just want to have fun or whatever other reason.
False. You can kiss anyone without having feelings for them.
false. a kiss is a kiss
if they say they like you then they do (maybe) ive said i liked sumone before but was just in the spur of the moment
False! Some girls are worse than guys and are only interested in hooking up.
not necessarily
FALSE.!
feeling in the pants
true
TRUE or FALSE...Alkali metals are valuable both in living organisms and as structural materials.?
False. The metals are not valuable for life, the ions are. All alkali metals are too soft and too reactive for use as structural materials.TRUE or FALSE...Alkali metals are valuable both in living organisms and as structural materials.?
False. The alkali metals as ions are very important to lifr. They are way too soft for structural materials.
False. The alkali metals as ions are very important to lifr. They are way too soft for structural materials.
True or false history questions?
the constitution was compleated in 1776
by the end of the convention, 39 delegates signed the constitution.
';abridging'; is the term used for combinong efforts in order to get a unified and agreed upon result
the right to peaceably assemble is found in the first amendment.
a hospital would be included in the public saftey serviceTrue or false history questions?
The Declaration of Independence was completed in 1776. Agreeing on a constitution took quite a bit more time. If you remember, after the Revolution the colonies were ';united'; in the Articles of Confederation, which was unpopular with everyone. I believe the Constitution was passed in 1789.loan
by the end of the convention, 39 delegates signed the constitution.
';abridging'; is the term used for combinong efforts in order to get a unified and agreed upon result
the right to peaceably assemble is found in the first amendment.
a hospital would be included in the public saftey serviceTrue or false history questions?
The Declaration of Independence was completed in 1776. Agreeing on a constitution took quite a bit more time. If you remember, after the Revolution the colonies were ';united'; in the Articles of Confederation, which was unpopular with everyone. I believe the Constitution was passed in 1789.
True or false:if p(x) is a polynomial, then?
if p(x) is a polynomial, then the function f(x)=p(x)/(x-1) has a vertical asymptote at x=1True or false:if p(x) is a polynomial, then?
False. The function doesn鈥檛 exist for x-1.True or false:if p(x) is a polynomial, then?
Not necessarily. p(x) could be x-1 or something multiplied by that binomial. There wouldn't be an asymptote there, but rather, a removable discontinuity there (a hole).
true.
False. The function doesn鈥檛 exist for x-1.True or false:if p(x) is a polynomial, then?
Not necessarily. p(x) could be x-1 or something multiplied by that binomial. There wouldn't be an asymptote there, but rather, a removable discontinuity there (a hole).
true.
True or false : The Red Sox won't play at Fenway again until 2008?
True - had the same thought last night...........True or false : The Red Sox won't play at Fenway again until 2008?
False. They'll lose Game 6.True or false : The Red Sox won't play at Fenway again until 2008?
we shall see when they play the games, it really hasn't been decided yet, lets just watch the series and see how it goes. That would be an ideal situation for some but lets just see.
False....................... they are going to play 5 more games there
They came back on my Yankees in 2004! Why are you counting them out.....I'm not!.....';it aint over till its over';....but still....GO YANKEES! STINKIN RED SOX!
true
False!!!! Easy question!
False they Will play game six at Fenway,remember pal this ain't over o.k.
False - the ALCS is 4 games out of 7 - the only way that could be true is if Cleveland, and had won all of the games so far, and wins tonight. The Red Sox won the first game in Boston, so they will play at least one more game in Fenway, even if they lose tonight. [Go Indians!]
I hope its true but I doubt it.
False, I believe they can bring it back but in a losing fashion. Doesnt matter anyway with the way Colorado is playing.
hey legendat...if we win tonight in cleveland, we can clinch in cleveland thursday. remeber theres 2 more games in c town. tonights and thursdays... will we win tonight and thurs.. i hope but realistically bostons tough and that may be hard to do...
Sad but true
True.
Downtown Cleveland will be a madhouse on Thursday night and I will probably not be making it to work on Friday morning.
If you were a true fan you would say false. The Indians have only won 2, Give the Red Sox a chance to come back!
False, even if Indians win tonight, game 5 will be at Fenway. Stupid question.
False. They'll lose Game 6.True or false : The Red Sox won't play at Fenway again until 2008?
we shall see when they play the games, it really hasn't been decided yet, lets just watch the series and see how it goes. That would be an ideal situation for some but lets just see.
False....................... they are going to play 5 more games there
They came back on my Yankees in 2004! Why are you counting them out.....I'm not!.....';it aint over till its over';....but still....GO YANKEES! STINKIN RED SOX!
true
False!!!! Easy question!
False they Will play game six at Fenway,remember pal this ain't over o.k.
False - the ALCS is 4 games out of 7 - the only way that could be true is if Cleveland, and had won all of the games so far, and wins tonight. The Red Sox won the first game in Boston, so they will play at least one more game in Fenway, even if they lose tonight. [Go Indians!]
I hope its true but I doubt it.
False, I believe they can bring it back but in a losing fashion. Doesnt matter anyway with the way Colorado is playing.
hey legendat...if we win tonight in cleveland, we can clinch in cleveland thursday. remeber theres 2 more games in c town. tonights and thursdays... will we win tonight and thurs.. i hope but realistically bostons tough and that may be hard to do...
Sad but true
True.
Downtown Cleveland will be a madhouse on Thursday night and I will probably not be making it to work on Friday morning.
If you were a true fan you would say false. The Indians have only won 2, Give the Red Sox a chance to come back!
False, even if Indians win tonight, game 5 will be at Fenway. Stupid question.
If humans are in the same class as domestic cats we must also be in the same order true or false? explain?
False.
In the system of zoological classification, Class is higher level of categorization than Order.
Both cats and humans are in the Class Mammalia, meaning they are both tetrapod vertebrates that have hair or fur, and nourish their young with milk produced by mammary glands on the female. There are also other similarities, such as a single lower jaw bone (mandible), and three inner ear bones.
These traits separate them from other Classes of Vertebrata, such as amphibians, reptiles and birds.
After that, though, there are many different Orders of mammal.
Cats are in Order Carnivora, characterized by the possession of a pair of blade-like shearing teeth known as the carnassials, formed by the upper 4th premolar and lower 1st molar on each side.
Humans are in Order Primates, which also includes lemurs, tarsiers, monkeys and the other great apes.If humans are in the same class as domestic cats we must also be in the same order true or false? explain?
I think true, if an order goes before class..
i.e.
Order:
Class:
or something. So, if we are in the Mammalia order, so are cats. They give live birth, feed their offspring milk, and are relativly... not as far off as an alligator would be.
In the system of zoological classification, Class is higher level of categorization than Order.
Both cats and humans are in the Class Mammalia, meaning they are both tetrapod vertebrates that have hair or fur, and nourish their young with milk produced by mammary glands on the female. There are also other similarities, such as a single lower jaw bone (mandible), and three inner ear bones.
These traits separate them from other Classes of Vertebrata, such as amphibians, reptiles and birds.
After that, though, there are many different Orders of mammal.
Cats are in Order Carnivora, characterized by the possession of a pair of blade-like shearing teeth known as the carnassials, formed by the upper 4th premolar and lower 1st molar on each side.
Humans are in Order Primates, which also includes lemurs, tarsiers, monkeys and the other great apes.If humans are in the same class as domestic cats we must also be in the same order true or false? explain?
I think true, if an order goes before class..
i.e.
Order:
Class:
or something. So, if we are in the Mammalia order, so are cats. They give live birth, feed their offspring milk, and are relativly... not as far off as an alligator would be.
True or False: You've spent at least $20 today?
true. exactly $20 on a fat dub sack. hahhaTrue or False: You've spent at least $20 today?
false i made at least 20 dollars todayTrue or False: You've spent at least $20 today?
False
True
False
False.
False.
False, spent no more than 8.
LOL yeah thats safe to say.
False, i spent $0 today :)
True, I spent $200 :O
false
false
false
true
False; I've only spent $2 today
True. I spent like $50 on clothes.
False, I've spent none.
true 38.00 on nothing
false.
False i stay home
False, I stayed home.
false i made money
false...i have spent nothing, i have not left my house today nor have i made any online purchases
false i made at least 20 dollars todayTrue or False: You've spent at least $20 today?
False
True
False
False.
False.
False, spent no more than 8.
LOL yeah thats safe to say.
False, i spent $0 today :)
True, I spent $200 :O
false
false
false
true
False; I've only spent $2 today
True. I spent like $50 on clothes.
False, I've spent none.
true 38.00 on nothing
false.
False i stay home
False, I stayed home.
false i made money
false...i have spent nothing, i have not left my house today nor have i made any online purchases
True or False: A ton of lead is heavier than a ton of feathers.?
I forgot if a ton of feathers was heavier or not, so I am asking, thanx for the answers!True or False: A ton of lead is heavier than a ton of feathers.?
same mass, same weightTrue or False: A ton of lead is heavier than a ton of feathers.?
False, a ton is a ton, regardless of what you are weighing.
It is false, a ton weighs a ton, no matter what it is you're weighing.
They both way a ton, so they are the same
false
They equal the same...that is what you stated. They both equal one ton. So your proposed question is false.
I thought that they both weighed the same.
False. A ton is a ton. Lead is only denser than feathers.
Yer kiddin' right? A ton of idiots weighs the same as a ton of Princeton Ph.D's, or a ton of lead or a ton of feathers. They just take up different amounts of space.
false, they are both a ton. now if you were to say wich one would it the ground first, then the led would be the answer. only because featers sorta scatter then land. so my answer for your question is indee, FALSE.
a ton is a ton
1 kg of iron equals 1 kg of stews but the volumes are different...
it's the same for lead and feather.
it's the matter of volume and weight.
then it's false.
I remeber getting this question on my 11+ back in the pre-comprehensive education days - a ton is a ton regardless what it is made from.
false Feathers are heavier as crazy as it sounds it is true.
haha theyre the same of course
false
It depends on how you weigh them. If you just look at the weight, theyre the same, so its false, but feathers will have air pockets, where lead has none... so thats gonna change the weight.
False
they weigh the same because theyre both a ton
same mass, same weightTrue or False: A ton of lead is heavier than a ton of feathers.?
False, a ton is a ton, regardless of what you are weighing.
It is false, a ton weighs a ton, no matter what it is you're weighing.
They both way a ton, so they are the same
false
They equal the same...that is what you stated. They both equal one ton. So your proposed question is false.
I thought that they both weighed the same.
False. A ton is a ton. Lead is only denser than feathers.
Yer kiddin' right? A ton of idiots weighs the same as a ton of Princeton Ph.D's, or a ton of lead or a ton of feathers. They just take up different amounts of space.
false, they are both a ton. now if you were to say wich one would it the ground first, then the led would be the answer. only because featers sorta scatter then land. so my answer for your question is indee, FALSE.
a ton is a ton
1 kg of iron equals 1 kg of stews but the volumes are different...
it's the same for lead and feather.
it's the matter of volume and weight.
then it's false.
I remeber getting this question on my 11+ back in the pre-comprehensive education days - a ton is a ton regardless what it is made from.
false Feathers are heavier as crazy as it sounds it is true.
haha theyre the same of course
false
It depends on how you weigh them. If you just look at the weight, theyre the same, so its false, but feathers will have air pockets, where lead has none... so thats gonna change the weight.
False
they weigh the same because theyre both a ton
True or False> The Earth's rotation is the main cause of the formation of ocean waves.?
Please answer fast! thank you!!!True or False%26gt; The Earth's rotation is the main cause of the formation of ocean waves.?
false
Waves and wind
How wind causes water to form waves is easy to understand although many intricate details still lack a satisfactory theory. On a perfectly calm sea, the wind has practically no grip. As it slides over the water surface film, it makes it move. As the water moves, it forms eddies and small ripples. Ironically, these ripples do not travel exactly in the direction of the wind but as two sets of parallel ripples, at angles 70-80潞 to the wind direction. The ripples make the water's surface rough, giving the wind a better grip. The ripples, starting at a minimum wave speed of 0.23 m/s, grow to wavelets and start to travel in the direction of the wind. At wind speeds of 4-6 knots (7-11 km/hr), these double wave fronts travel at about 30潞 from the wind. The surface still looks glassy overall but as the wind speed increases, the wavelets become high enough to interact with the air flow and the surface starts to look rough. The wind becomes turbulent just above the surface and starts transferring energy to the waves. Strong winds are more turbulent and make waves more easily.
The rougher the water becomes, the easier it is for the wind to transfer its energy. The waves become steep and choppy. Further away from the shore, the water's surface is not only stirred by the wind but also by waves arriving with the wind. These waves influence the motion of the water particles such that opposing movements gradually cancel out, whereas synchronising movements are enhanced. The waves start to become more rounded and harmonious. Depending on duration and distance (fetch), the waves develop into a fully developed sea.
Anyone familiar with the sea, knows that waves never assume a uniform, harmonious shape. Even when the wind has blown strictly from one direction only, the resulting water movement is made up of various waves, each with a different speed and height. Although some waves are small, most waves have a certain height and sometimes a wave occurs which is much higher.True or False%26gt; The Earth's rotation is the main cause of the formation of ocean waves.?
False.
Wind is the largest contributor.
false.loan
false
Waves and wind
How wind causes water to form waves is easy to understand although many intricate details still lack a satisfactory theory. On a perfectly calm sea, the wind has practically no grip. As it slides over the water surface film, it makes it move. As the water moves, it forms eddies and small ripples. Ironically, these ripples do not travel exactly in the direction of the wind but as two sets of parallel ripples, at angles 70-80潞 to the wind direction. The ripples make the water's surface rough, giving the wind a better grip. The ripples, starting at a minimum wave speed of 0.23 m/s, grow to wavelets and start to travel in the direction of the wind. At wind speeds of 4-6 knots (7-11 km/hr), these double wave fronts travel at about 30潞 from the wind. The surface still looks glassy overall but as the wind speed increases, the wavelets become high enough to interact with the air flow and the surface starts to look rough. The wind becomes turbulent just above the surface and starts transferring energy to the waves. Strong winds are more turbulent and make waves more easily.
The rougher the water becomes, the easier it is for the wind to transfer its energy. The waves become steep and choppy. Further away from the shore, the water's surface is not only stirred by the wind but also by waves arriving with the wind. These waves influence the motion of the water particles such that opposing movements gradually cancel out, whereas synchronising movements are enhanced. The waves start to become more rounded and harmonious. Depending on duration and distance (fetch), the waves develop into a fully developed sea.
Anyone familiar with the sea, knows that waves never assume a uniform, harmonious shape. Even when the wind has blown strictly from one direction only, the resulting water movement is made up of various waves, each with a different speed and height. Although some waves are small, most waves have a certain height and sometimes a wave occurs which is much higher.True or False%26gt; The Earth's rotation is the main cause of the formation of ocean waves.?
False.
Wind is the largest contributor.
false.
Do king charles need a special diet,people have told me to avoid all meat forms,is this true or false,many tha?
i own a king charles and he doesn't have a special diet. We buy him the pedigree senior as he is really old but you can get pedigree puppy and pedigree adult and i think a few more. It is a yellow bag:
http://www.feedem.co.uk/dog-2/dog-food-1鈥?/a>
You can get pouches and cans aswel but mine prefers dry. The only special requirment for these dogs is to feed them pedigree food, a lot of the other stuff can make them ill. Roast cicken and rice is what we also feed my dog for a special dinner!!
Hope i helped!
X
JORDAN S - My king charles is 14 in december and is showing no signs of kicking the bucket!!Do king charles need a special diet,people have told me to avoid all meat forms,is this true or false,many tha?
Wow, their dogs probably won't live past 12. Anyways, if your dog does come down with some allergy, salmon-based dog food is the best. Most vegetarian owners anxious to get their dogs on a cruelty-free diet, will find out their dog is allergic to chicken and automatically switch to a vegan kibble when they haven't even tried venison,duck,fish,or lamb, saying that their dog is allergic to meat.
I feed my dog Innova EVO small bites. Perfect. High in protein and low in carbs.Do king charles need a special diet,people have told me to avoid all meat forms,is this true or false,many tha?
for ALL dogs, you want to look at the first 10 ingredients specifically, in all dog foods... this makes up 80% of the food's content. The first and foremost ingredients should be MEAT. (Make sure it says a specific meat, ex: Chicken, Lamb, Turkey.)
You want to avoid WHEAT and CORN as many dogs have allergies to these two items, and they are do not meet the dog's nutritional needs, but are simply a filler.
Also avoid ';Bi-products'; This means it is not muscle, but the feathers, beak, feet etc. of the animal.
';Gluten'; is the product that was in the news not too long ago, it is to be avoided as well. Your best bet is to NOT buy your dog food at the grocery store, but go to a pet shop and read ingredients. I like ';Blue Diamond'; brand from PetSmart personally but there are a lot to pick from.
Some dogs are allergic to various foods just like some people. King Charles Spaniels are no more likely to be allergic to meat than any other breed of dog.
Here are two Web pages for national clubs. Neither mention anything about needing a meat free diet. They do mention a variety of potential health issues that good breeders are trying to breed out of their lines. The people you have talked to are clearly badly misinformed. I would take anything else they told you with a giant grain of salt! You will be able to find a reputable breeder on these sites and lots of good information about the breed as well.
http://www.ckcsc.org/
http://www.ackcsc.org/
King Charles are a breed of dog. A dog eats meat.
However some dogs in any breed, or a mutt, can sometimes need a special diet. But that's not down to the type of dog, it's down to the possible special needs of the individual dog (is that English?)
So what you have been told is false lol.
Try him on small amounts of food first, Hills is a very good one and it was recommended to me by my vet. Sometimes dry is better than wet but it is up to you. Just don't over feed him.
What!!?? Sorry, It's absolute rubbish!
Dogs are carnivores first and foremost, they need meat as their principle and main food source.
Feeding dogs anything else is animal cruelty in my opinion.
Dogs are carnivore. They eat meat. Feed a high quality kibble and keep the vaccinations to a minimum and you'll be fine.
Your dog is a descendant of the wolf, of course he eats meat. All dogs are carnivores.
no, dogs eat meat. not just certain kinds of dogs. all dogs eat meat.
It's false. Normal dog food is perfectly fine for him.
Is a King Charles like a Prince Albert?
http://www.feedem.co.uk/dog-2/dog-food-1鈥?/a>
You can get pouches and cans aswel but mine prefers dry. The only special requirment for these dogs is to feed them pedigree food, a lot of the other stuff can make them ill. Roast cicken and rice is what we also feed my dog for a special dinner!!
Hope i helped!
X
JORDAN S - My king charles is 14 in december and is showing no signs of kicking the bucket!!Do king charles need a special diet,people have told me to avoid all meat forms,is this true or false,many tha?
Wow, their dogs probably won't live past 12. Anyways, if your dog does come down with some allergy, salmon-based dog food is the best. Most vegetarian owners anxious to get their dogs on a cruelty-free diet, will find out their dog is allergic to chicken and automatically switch to a vegan kibble when they haven't even tried venison,duck,fish,or lamb, saying that their dog is allergic to meat.
I feed my dog Innova EVO small bites. Perfect. High in protein and low in carbs.Do king charles need a special diet,people have told me to avoid all meat forms,is this true or false,many tha?
for ALL dogs, you want to look at the first 10 ingredients specifically, in all dog foods... this makes up 80% of the food's content. The first and foremost ingredients should be MEAT. (Make sure it says a specific meat, ex: Chicken, Lamb, Turkey.)
You want to avoid WHEAT and CORN as many dogs have allergies to these two items, and they are do not meet the dog's nutritional needs, but are simply a filler.
Also avoid ';Bi-products'; This means it is not muscle, but the feathers, beak, feet etc. of the animal.
';Gluten'; is the product that was in the news not too long ago, it is to be avoided as well. Your best bet is to NOT buy your dog food at the grocery store, but go to a pet shop and read ingredients. I like ';Blue Diamond'; brand from PetSmart personally but there are a lot to pick from.
Some dogs are allergic to various foods just like some people. King Charles Spaniels are no more likely to be allergic to meat than any other breed of dog.
Here are two Web pages for national clubs. Neither mention anything about needing a meat free diet. They do mention a variety of potential health issues that good breeders are trying to breed out of their lines. The people you have talked to are clearly badly misinformed. I would take anything else they told you with a giant grain of salt! You will be able to find a reputable breeder on these sites and lots of good information about the breed as well.
http://www.ckcsc.org/
http://www.ackcsc.org/
King Charles are a breed of dog. A dog eats meat.
However some dogs in any breed, or a mutt, can sometimes need a special diet. But that's not down to the type of dog, it's down to the possible special needs of the individual dog (is that English?)
So what you have been told is false lol.
Try him on small amounts of food first, Hills is a very good one and it was recommended to me by my vet. Sometimes dry is better than wet but it is up to you. Just don't over feed him.
What!!?? Sorry, It's absolute rubbish!
Dogs are carnivores first and foremost, they need meat as their principle and main food source.
Feeding dogs anything else is animal cruelty in my opinion.
Dogs are carnivore. They eat meat. Feed a high quality kibble and keep the vaccinations to a minimum and you'll be fine.
Your dog is a descendant of the wolf, of course he eats meat. All dogs are carnivores.
no, dogs eat meat. not just certain kinds of dogs. all dogs eat meat.
It's false. Normal dog food is perfectly fine for him.
Is a King Charles like a Prince Albert?
True or False. Gases are the least dense of the three states of matter.?
TRUE.
Solids are the most dense, then liquids, and gases are the least dense.True or False. Gases are the least dense of the three states of matter.?
FALSE. Plasma is the least dense state of matter.True or False. Gases are the least dense of the three states of matter.?
True.
yes of couse,or you will be dead if air is not.
duh
Solids are the most dense, then liquids, and gases are the least dense.True or False. Gases are the least dense of the three states of matter.?
FALSE. Plasma is the least dense state of matter.True or False. Gases are the least dense of the three states of matter.?
True.
yes of couse,or you will be dead if air is not.
duh
True or False: Raisin in Champagne!?
Is it true that a raisin dropped in a glass of fresh champagne will bounce up and down continuously from the bottom of the glass to the top?
I need to know!
=)True or False: Raisin in Champagne!?
Yep. The raisin normally doesn't float but the bubbles in the champagne stick to it and carry it to the top. Then the bubbles pop and it drops back down. You can do it with other bubbly liquids but which ones work completely depends on their density.True or False: Raisin in Champagne!?
yes but why put raisian in champagne, im sure it don't taste good.
Why not test it yourself?
yes
I need to know!
=)True or False: Raisin in Champagne!?
Yep. The raisin normally doesn't float but the bubbles in the champagne stick to it and carry it to the top. Then the bubbles pop and it drops back down. You can do it with other bubbly liquids but which ones work completely depends on their density.True or False: Raisin in Champagne!?
yes but why put raisian in champagne, im sure it don't taste good.
Why not test it yourself?
yes
True or false?different electromagnetic waves travel through vacuum at different speeds?
i need help! pleasee and thankk yaa:)True or false?different electromagnetic waves travel through vacuum at different speeds?
False. I think the other gave a good reason why.True or false?different electromagnetic waves travel through vacuum at different speeds?
False. From the longest waves which is just above DC to daylight and above all travel at the speed of light in a vacuum which is 186,000 miles per second.
False. They're all made of photons, regardless of the frequency. Photons always move at the speed of light.
False. I think the other gave a good reason why.True or false?different electromagnetic waves travel through vacuum at different speeds?
False. From the longest waves which is just above DC to daylight and above all travel at the speed of light in a vacuum which is 186,000 miles per second.
False. They're all made of photons, regardless of the frequency. Photons always move at the speed of light.
True or False: Everyone in the proximity of a pretend play scenario is in the play frame. ?
A regular audience is not in the play frame; but then it is not a ';pretend'; play scenario: it is a real one. However, if someone pretends to put on a play it is in the nature of a practical joke intended to fool as many people as possible, and that would include people in the vicinity.True or False: Everyone in the proximity of a pretend play scenario is in the play frame. ?
True. The play should be able to make everyone feel as if they are in it.
True. The play should be able to make everyone feel as if they are in it.
True or false : Liberal Christianity stands a better chance for success than conservative Christianity?
I'm not quite sure what you mean by ';success';....
EDIT: Well then the answer would probably be no because liberal Christians usually aren't trying to ';win'; anyone over anyway.
Opinionated: ';There were no liberal Christians in the Bible.';
Jesus was liberal for his time. Granted he was Christ, not a Christian, but still....True or false : Liberal Christianity stands a better chance for success than conservative Christianity?
Since most Christians are liberal Christians, I would say history bears out the former.True or false : Liberal Christianity stands a better chance for success than conservative Christianity?
Yes. I'm not going to believe in it either way but if they want more sheep *ahem*... uh, I mean, followers then, they're going to have to loosen up and stop being so homophobic and hateful towards other religions.
Not lately no, people are scared ****-less and looking for something big and dramatic...
True, because liberal christianity is more progressive than the 2000 yr old version.
How many gay and lesbian people would be christians if not for the whole being gay is a mortal sin ranting by the conservative christians?
Right now, the Episcopal Church has a better chance of surviving longer than any other sect of christianity. If only because they tend not to preach hate about gays. Well, the liberal Episcopal church that is, not the ones that are breaking away to join with the African churches. (which is, btw, more or less against how they work. The rule being you do not poach followers on another's turf)
It's the quality of your own heart that counts, not numbers.
As hearts turn, it's contagious.
Perhaps, but there were no liberal Christians in the bible.
False.
Just look at talk radio as an example. Liberal talk radio bombed so badly that you can hardly find a station with liberal views anymore, while conservative talk radio is everywhere.
True.
My conjecture is that the current strong wave of rigid conservative Christianity will loose some strength and the tide will ebb back to (at least) a more moderate stance, and the liberal Christians will play a bigger role.
Much of the conservative movement is too rigid and with the transparency of media documenting fundamentalism (Jesus Camp, Creation Museum, the Phelps, internet news sites that detail stuff like that Navy vet denied a memorial service), the backlash against the ';fundies'; and extremists will grow.
What's the diff?
It may be true. Or not.
I know a lot of those around me want a more forgiving, tolerant, loving religion and I live in a very conservative place.
There are a lot of the same people researching other religions or deciding to '; take a break'; from practice.
For the most part I am shocked by these people, they were always percieved as very Christian/conservative.
Time will tell.
True.
spiritual christianity stands a better chance than religious christianity
I'm inclined to think so. Provided only that the reactionaries don't manage to set the world on fire.
False.
Look at the Anglican or United churches right now. They are losing membership hand over foot in North America over their descision to allow same sex marriage among other things.
Watered down versions of the truth may attract in the short term, but will fade away with time.
Life changes come with a price. The long term means total commitment to the entire package.
No substitutions, No additives.
False- liberal churches are closing their doors all over America!
I think surviving 100 years after the other dies out doesn't constitute success.loan
EDIT: Well then the answer would probably be no because liberal Christians usually aren't trying to ';win'; anyone over anyway.
Opinionated: ';There were no liberal Christians in the Bible.';
Jesus was liberal for his time. Granted he was Christ, not a Christian, but still....True or false : Liberal Christianity stands a better chance for success than conservative Christianity?
Since most Christians are liberal Christians, I would say history bears out the former.True or false : Liberal Christianity stands a better chance for success than conservative Christianity?
Yes. I'm not going to believe in it either way but if they want more sheep *ahem*... uh, I mean, followers then, they're going to have to loosen up and stop being so homophobic and hateful towards other religions.
Not lately no, people are scared ****-less and looking for something big and dramatic...
True, because liberal christianity is more progressive than the 2000 yr old version.
How many gay and lesbian people would be christians if not for the whole being gay is a mortal sin ranting by the conservative christians?
Right now, the Episcopal Church has a better chance of surviving longer than any other sect of christianity. If only because they tend not to preach hate about gays. Well, the liberal Episcopal church that is, not the ones that are breaking away to join with the African churches. (which is, btw, more or less against how they work. The rule being you do not poach followers on another's turf)
It's the quality of your own heart that counts, not numbers.
As hearts turn, it's contagious.
Perhaps, but there were no liberal Christians in the bible.
False.
Just look at talk radio as an example. Liberal talk radio bombed so badly that you can hardly find a station with liberal views anymore, while conservative talk radio is everywhere.
True.
My conjecture is that the current strong wave of rigid conservative Christianity will loose some strength and the tide will ebb back to (at least) a more moderate stance, and the liberal Christians will play a bigger role.
Much of the conservative movement is too rigid and with the transparency of media documenting fundamentalism (Jesus Camp, Creation Museum, the Phelps, internet news sites that detail stuff like that Navy vet denied a memorial service), the backlash against the ';fundies'; and extremists will grow.
What's the diff?
It may be true. Or not.
I know a lot of those around me want a more forgiving, tolerant, loving religion and I live in a very conservative place.
There are a lot of the same people researching other religions or deciding to '; take a break'; from practice.
For the most part I am shocked by these people, they were always percieved as very Christian/conservative.
Time will tell.
True.
spiritual christianity stands a better chance than religious christianity
I'm inclined to think so. Provided only that the reactionaries don't manage to set the world on fire.
False.
Look at the Anglican or United churches right now. They are losing membership hand over foot in North America over their descision to allow same sex marriage among other things.
Watered down versions of the truth may attract in the short term, but will fade away with time.
Life changes come with a price. The long term means total commitment to the entire package.
No substitutions, No additives.
False- liberal churches are closing their doors all over America!
I think surviving 100 years after the other dies out doesn't constitute success.
True or False Psychology help?
True or False?
1.The group or groups to which we belong play an important par in the formation of our attitudes.
2.Public opinion polls are designed to measure attitudes.
3.Advertisers NEVER appeal to physical drives in commercials.
4.A newspapers handling of a news story may be influences by the papers editorial policy.
I need these answers asap if anyone can please answer them.True or False Psychology help?
1. True
2. False - opinion polls measure opinions, not attitudes.
3. False - People always look at physical, and advertisers know that, so they advertise it to make their advertisement more ';effective'; to the public.
4. TrueTrue or False Psychology help?
1. True
2. False, I think they're done poorly and often reflect propaganda.
3. False, it's called sex, and it's physical.
4. True, of course! There is a certain amount of propganda in today's media. Don't beleive me? Look up Fox news.
1. True.
2. False. I think it has a more broad purpose than that.
3. False. They quite often do.
4. True.
I'm no psychologist though.
1. True
2. False
3. False
4. True
1.The group or groups to which we belong play an important par in the formation of our attitudes.
2.Public opinion polls are designed to measure attitudes.
3.Advertisers NEVER appeal to physical drives in commercials.
4.A newspapers handling of a news story may be influences by the papers editorial policy.
I need these answers asap if anyone can please answer them.True or False Psychology help?
1. True
2. False - opinion polls measure opinions, not attitudes.
3. False - People always look at physical, and advertisers know that, so they advertise it to make their advertisement more ';effective'; to the public.
4. TrueTrue or False Psychology help?
1. True
2. False, I think they're done poorly and often reflect propaganda.
3. False, it's called sex, and it's physical.
4. True, of course! There is a certain amount of propganda in today's media. Don't beleive me? Look up Fox news.
1. True.
2. False. I think it has a more broad purpose than that.
3. False. They quite often do.
4. True.
I'm no psychologist though.
1. True
2. False
3. False
4. True
True or false skin is the body's largest organ?
True!True or false skin is the body's largest organ?
True. And I'll drink a large glass of cold water to that!True or false skin is the body's largest organ?
true dont let anybody tell you otherwise
TRUE!!! :)
True
TRUE
true duh
True. And I'll drink a large glass of cold water to that!True or false skin is the body's largest organ?
true dont let anybody tell you otherwise
TRUE!!! :)
True
TRUE
true duh
True or False : Congress can never effectively overturn a U.S. Supreme Court decision by amending a statute.?
If congress changes a law, the Supreme Court decision still stands, because the law only applies to this point forward. ';Ex Post Facto'; laws are illegal. You can bring new cases to be tried under the new law, but it won't overturn the decision of the Supremes.
You can't arrest me for parking on the south side of the street a month ago, if you only enacted the law that made it illegal last week. When I did it, it was legal. You can change the law, but you can't make what I did before the law illegal.True or False : Congress can never effectively overturn a U.S. Supreme Court decision by amending a statute.?
I think the key phrase here is “effectively overturn,” meaning to overturn in effect or in application. In that case I believe the statement to be false because a statute declared unconstitutional may be so because of some element that the court objects to. If that element is removed by amending the law, the courts decision is “effectively” overturned even though it stands in the record in relation to the law in its original form.True or False : Congress can never effectively overturn a U.S. Supreme Court decision by amending a statute.?
False: The Supreme Court often interprets the ';intent of Congress'; when making a decision. If Congress passes new legislation making something explicitly clear, then that trumps the Supremes. The court might come back with the decision that the whole thing is unconstitutional.
You can't arrest me for parking on the south side of the street a month ago, if you only enacted the law that made it illegal last week. When I did it, it was legal. You can change the law, but you can't make what I did before the law illegal.True or False : Congress can never effectively overturn a U.S. Supreme Court decision by amending a statute.?
I think the key phrase here is “effectively overturn,” meaning to overturn in effect or in application. In that case I believe the statement to be false because a statute declared unconstitutional may be so because of some element that the court objects to. If that element is removed by amending the law, the courts decision is “effectively” overturned even though it stands in the record in relation to the law in its original form.True or False : Congress can never effectively overturn a U.S. Supreme Court decision by amending a statute.?
False: The Supreme Court often interprets the ';intent of Congress'; when making a decision. If Congress passes new legislation making something explicitly clear, then that trumps the Supremes. The court might come back with the decision that the whole thing is unconstitutional.
True or false history question?
Majority whips are chosen by a majority vote of the total membership in each respective house.
True
FalseTrue or false history question?
FalseTrue or false history question?
False. Majority Whips are the second highest-ranking individual in the minority party.
false Only the majority political party votes and the majority rules on whom the majority whip will become.
False
Majority whips are chosen by the majority vote of the majority party of the respective house.
False. They are chosed by the party that is in the majority
false
False.
In the Senate, the Majority Whip is the third or fourth highest-ranking individual in the majority party (the party with the greater number of legislators in a legislative body). The Majority Whip is outranked by the Majority Leader, the President Pro Tempore and, if the majority also holds the executive branch, the President of the Senate. Because the office of President Pro Tempore is largely honorific, usually given to the senior senator of the majority, and the President of the Senate only acts in cases of a tie, the Majority Leader holds considerably more power than his or her House counterpart and so by extension an argument could be made that the Majority Whip is the second ranking individual in terms of actual power. Similarly, in the House the Majority Whip is outranked by both the Majority Leader and the Speaker.
In both the House and the Senate, the Minority Whip is the second highest-ranking individual in the minority party (the party with the lesser number of legislators in a legislative body), outranked only by the Minority Leader.
True
FalseTrue or false history question?
FalseTrue or false history question?
False. Majority Whips are the second highest-ranking individual in the minority party.
false Only the majority political party votes and the majority rules on whom the majority whip will become.
False
Majority whips are chosen by the majority vote of the majority party of the respective house.
False. They are chosed by the party that is in the majority
false
False.
In the Senate, the Majority Whip is the third or fourth highest-ranking individual in the majority party (the party with the greater number of legislators in a legislative body). The Majority Whip is outranked by the Majority Leader, the President Pro Tempore and, if the majority also holds the executive branch, the President of the Senate. Because the office of President Pro Tempore is largely honorific, usually given to the senior senator of the majority, and the President of the Senate only acts in cases of a tie, the Majority Leader holds considerably more power than his or her House counterpart and so by extension an argument could be made that the Majority Whip is the second ranking individual in terms of actual power. Similarly, in the House the Majority Whip is outranked by both the Majority Leader and the Speaker.
In both the House and the Senate, the Minority Whip is the second highest-ranking individual in the minority party (the party with the lesser number of legislators in a legislative body), outranked only by the Minority Leader.
True or false? The terms “aerobic fitness” and “cardio-respiratory fitness” mean the same thing.?
Pretty much the same thing, I'd say. One sounds like someone trying to be too clever, the other is more a buzzphrase for personal trainers.True or false? The terms “aerobic fitness” and “cardio-respiratory fitness” mean the same thing.?
when i got my fitness specialist cert., cardio-resp. fit. meant pulse/breathing rate...while aerobic fit. meant the vox uptake-how much oxygen ws actually being absorbed by the blood from the alveoli...good luck.
when i got my fitness specialist cert., cardio-resp. fit. meant pulse/breathing rate...while aerobic fit. meant the vox uptake-how much oxygen ws actually being absorbed by the blood from the alveoli...good luck.
True or False Poll: You can pick your friends but you can't pick your family?
And do you like everyone in your family? Ever think of just NOT talking to a family member anymore?True or False Poll: You can pick your friends but you can't pick your family?
It is true that you can pick your friends but you can't pick your family. However, not all family members act like family all of the time and if the family member is that crappy towards me, I not only think of not talking to a family member anymore, I actually don't talk to them unless they shape up.True or False Poll: You can pick your friends but you can't pick your family?
True, i never had a prob with my family , but i had experience from my mom family , who had a prob with family heritage, and even now she never talks to her brother and sister.. so sad really... how money can breaks family.
False.
I went friendless for years because I came up with the idea that my friends HAVE to be people I have everything in common with. Well, the friendless years ended that myth.
I've made friends with people I have little in common with, but who are nice people, and my life isn't so morbid and gloomy now. You have to take what friendships you can find.
FALSE: You pick your family before you incarnate in order to complete the lessons and complete the karma you have with those relatives. Everything is written in your Book of Life.
You can never pick your friends. A few years ago, I was forced to be friends with this girl who was really immature and thought herself the opposite. Worst year of my life. Hated Middle School. Still do. ((I'm still there....argh...)) Truth is, I'm better off alone. (howls)
-Kaylie
You can pick half of your family (by marriage), and can always choose to dissasociate with those who just are not family 'material'. And I have chosen to not talk with certain Ex-family members.
true you are stuck with the family they are yours no matter if you talk to them or not. friends on the other hand you can pick and choose who you hang out with.
True.
Mostly, yes... but some of them are really BUGGING me right now.
Yes, but then, she's not talking to ME ';first.';
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
Now adays you can pick your family, unfortunately.
Anything is possible with the internet these days.
You could probably buy a new family on ebay.
um true
you can love but not like some family members
you can dislike and not love some you get thru marriage
but i guess if you show respect and grit your teeth and bite your tongue all's well
well you can chose who you marry and they become family
TRUE /NO/THINK I DON'T, POINT BLANK DO NOT TALK IF WE DO IT IS LIKE WAR...............TEMPER-MENTAL.........鈥?TURMOIL ............
True.
There are a few.
My older brother and I might talk once a year or so.
False ....you can pick family members. I am adopting my step daughter.
True...
true %26amp; yes:))d
I call my best friends my family. Having no siblings at all is just sad; that's why I always surround myself with people.
true and false
U dont get to pick ir parents or grandparents so on but ur wife u can choose
I love my parents. I don't talk to my brothers that much. I have what they call the ';middle child syndrome.';
I LOVE my mom and dad etc!!
they're my world!
Trueloan
It is true that you can pick your friends but you can't pick your family. However, not all family members act like family all of the time and if the family member is that crappy towards me, I not only think of not talking to a family member anymore, I actually don't talk to them unless they shape up.True or False Poll: You can pick your friends but you can't pick your family?
True, i never had a prob with my family , but i had experience from my mom family , who had a prob with family heritage, and even now she never talks to her brother and sister.. so sad really... how money can breaks family.
False.
I went friendless for years because I came up with the idea that my friends HAVE to be people I have everything in common with. Well, the friendless years ended that myth.
I've made friends with people I have little in common with, but who are nice people, and my life isn't so morbid and gloomy now. You have to take what friendships you can find.
FALSE: You pick your family before you incarnate in order to complete the lessons and complete the karma you have with those relatives. Everything is written in your Book of Life.
You can never pick your friends. A few years ago, I was forced to be friends with this girl who was really immature and thought herself the opposite. Worst year of my life. Hated Middle School. Still do. ((I'm still there....argh...)) Truth is, I'm better off alone. (howls)
-Kaylie
You can pick half of your family (by marriage), and can always choose to dissasociate with those who just are not family 'material'. And I have chosen to not talk with certain Ex-family members.
true you are stuck with the family they are yours no matter if you talk to them or not. friends on the other hand you can pick and choose who you hang out with.
True.
Mostly, yes... but some of them are really BUGGING me right now.
Yes, but then, she's not talking to ME ';first.';
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
Now adays you can pick your family, unfortunately.
Anything is possible with the internet these days.
You could probably buy a new family on ebay.
um true
you can love but not like some family members
you can dislike and not love some you get thru marriage
but i guess if you show respect and grit your teeth and bite your tongue all's well
well you can chose who you marry and they become family
TRUE /NO/THINK I DON'T, POINT BLANK DO NOT TALK IF WE DO IT IS LIKE WAR...............TEMPER-MENTAL.........鈥?TURMOIL ............
True.
There are a few.
My older brother and I might talk once a year or so.
False ....you can pick family members. I am adopting my step daughter.
True...
true %26amp; yes:))d
I call my best friends my family. Having no siblings at all is just sad; that's why I always surround myself with people.
true and false
U dont get to pick ir parents or grandparents so on but ur wife u can choose
I love my parents. I don't talk to my brothers that much. I have what they call the ';middle child syndrome.';
I LOVE my mom and dad etc!!
they're my world!
True
True or false,and explain,please,thank you?
One interpretation of depreciation and amortization is that it is a fixed cost of the firm. true or false?True or false,and explain,please,thank you?
It is a fixed cost that depreciates over a said period of time, and thus can be amortized during that specific time period.True or false,and explain,please,thank you?
true because it doesnt change with changes in revenue or sales.
It is a fixed cost that depreciates over a said period of time, and thus can be amortized during that specific time period.True or false,and explain,please,thank you?
true because it doesnt change with changes in revenue or sales.
True or False- If you don't fight the enemy on their land, they will come and attack you on yours?
again...iraq was not responsible for 911.True or False- If you don't fight the enemy on their land, they will come and attack you on yours?
That cannot be answered as true or false.
Depends on how paranoid the enemy is about you coming to invade first.True or False- If you don't fight the enemy on their land, they will come and attack you on yours?
Depends. In most cases it is true
That is as a rule true. The catch to the question is, is the ';enemy'; really your enemy or a perceived enemy? Given the man power, supplies, money and other resources your enemy will always come to fight you if they can. It's always best to go when you have the upper hand, before they end up getting it. =)
I thought they did? I guess I am mis-informed.
FACT. TRUE. Liberals believe that if we just talk to them they will stop hating us.
False. They come to your land to fight you when they can't get you off their land by any other means.
Depends on the enemies' means ... There is no chance that Afghanistan, Iran, Syria and the like would be able to fight a war on US of A territory
Absolute truth; the 9/11 event prooved it.
Thank you for the strategic advice, my dear. Upon enslaving your planet I can promise you your servitude to me will be most enjoyable, given time.
True enough, that is why I was getting work related nastygrams on my personal email account.
Did 9/11 teach you the answer to this? Before we went on the offensive, we were getting bombed everywhere!! Now, we have it contained to an area the size of two mid sized states halfway accross the world.
George Bush thinks so.
TRUE
True.
Take an 'A' for the day.
Now, move to the head of the class.
False. But it depends on who the enemy is and what counrty they might attack.
Yes, that is true. The best defense is always a good offense.
False. The Native Americans had no design in attacking Europe. Ireland had no designs on attacking England. Iraq had no designs on attacking the USA. The Aztecs had no designs on attacking Spain. The French had no designs on attacking Germany.The list goes on and on.
true look at the invasion of Hawaii from japan. that was unexpected.
rhetorical and designed to be inflammatory. i don't think Saddam could have mounted too much of an offense.
false
Eventually yes.
That is False. But we are breeding terrorists for generations to come, by attacking the wrong country, the Republicans might make that dream come true.
Who is the enemy again? Sunnis? Shia? Al-sadr? Saddam?
Haha, classic BS that's been used since the beginning of time.
Yes you're right, I'm sure Saddam was planning a massive invasion of America... good thing we nipped it in the bud and got over there to have our soldiers do their dyin eh?
True Failure to stop aggression of one county or in one country shows a week and venerable society thus if sufficient strength is gained by one they will look for who is seen as weak and the attack is on. Look at how WWI and WWII began and you will see how this has happened in the past and by all indication will happen again. If you don't fight to protect what you have you are sending a message to the world that you really don't care about what you have.
That cannot be answered as true or false.
Depends on how paranoid the enemy is about you coming to invade first.True or False- If you don't fight the enemy on their land, they will come and attack you on yours?
Depends. In most cases it is true
That is as a rule true. The catch to the question is, is the ';enemy'; really your enemy or a perceived enemy? Given the man power, supplies, money and other resources your enemy will always come to fight you if they can. It's always best to go when you have the upper hand, before they end up getting it. =)
I thought they did? I guess I am mis-informed.
FACT. TRUE. Liberals believe that if we just talk to them they will stop hating us.
False. They come to your land to fight you when they can't get you off their land by any other means.
Depends on the enemies' means ... There is no chance that Afghanistan, Iran, Syria and the like would be able to fight a war on US of A territory
Absolute truth; the 9/11 event prooved it.
Thank you for the strategic advice, my dear. Upon enslaving your planet I can promise you your servitude to me will be most enjoyable, given time.
True enough, that is why I was getting work related nastygrams on my personal email account.
Did 9/11 teach you the answer to this? Before we went on the offensive, we were getting bombed everywhere!! Now, we have it contained to an area the size of two mid sized states halfway accross the world.
George Bush thinks so.
TRUE
True.
Take an 'A' for the day.
Now, move to the head of the class.
False. But it depends on who the enemy is and what counrty they might attack.
Yes, that is true. The best defense is always a good offense.
False. The Native Americans had no design in attacking Europe. Ireland had no designs on attacking England. Iraq had no designs on attacking the USA. The Aztecs had no designs on attacking Spain. The French had no designs on attacking Germany.The list goes on and on.
true look at the invasion of Hawaii from japan. that was unexpected.
rhetorical and designed to be inflammatory. i don't think Saddam could have mounted too much of an offense.
false
Eventually yes.
That is False. But we are breeding terrorists for generations to come, by attacking the wrong country, the Republicans might make that dream come true.
Who is the enemy again? Sunnis? Shia? Al-sadr? Saddam?
Haha, classic BS that's been used since the beginning of time.
Yes you're right, I'm sure Saddam was planning a massive invasion of America... good thing we nipped it in the bud and got over there to have our soldiers do their dyin eh?
True Failure to stop aggression of one county or in one country shows a week and venerable society thus if sufficient strength is gained by one they will look for who is seen as weak and the attack is on. Look at how WWI and WWII began and you will see how this has happened in the past and by all indication will happen again. If you don't fight to protect what you have you are sending a message to the world that you really don't care about what you have.
True or False: Christianity was originally created as a way to gain power and control the masses?
';Religion is what keeps the poor man from murdering the rich.'; Napoleon BonaparteTrue or False: Christianity was originally created as a way to gain power and control the masses?
False. In Antioch, when the term was first used, Christians were a tiny and persecuted Semitic minority. It is quite unlikely they were under any illusion that any time in their own lifetimes there'd be any ';masses'; to ';control.';True or False: Christianity was originally created as a way to gain power and control the masses?
Well, if that was the case, it was a complete failure (for anyone involved in its conception).
Every apostle (including Paul) except John were murdered for their beliefs. Christians were being killed even while the New Testament was still being written. Power? Only if being thrown into prison, whipped, beaten, and finally murdered is power.
It also was certainly not created as a way to control the masses. Judaism did a much better job of that than Christianity. If anything, it was created as a way loose all power, but to free the masses!
Therefore, 100% FALSE!
Just like every other religion.
False
False
I,m a non-religious history nut. I never got that impression from the hundreds of history books that I've read. What was your source ?
I don't know about ';originally';. It may have been created as a mystery religion for the Hebrews, like the many other extant mystery religions of the era, but then was changed into a literal form and used to gain power and control the masses. I'm not sure we'll ever know for sure exactly how it began, since the Roman Catholic Church did its best to eradicate any and all documents that contradicted the ';official'; version.
TRUE!!! It is still being used in that manner.
True
Totally true. Created to gain power, control the masses and blackmail the lands and money from the people.
True all the way!!!!!!!!
The first 3 centuries of Christianity shows they were brutally persecuted. The first 30 popes were martyred.
And you call that a way to gain power and control masses? If anything, in todays world the real ';gaining power and control masses'; is the Dictator of Moral Relativism, which is diametrically opposed to Christianity.
Where did you come up with an idea like that? False.
False. I think that, at the very beginning, it was intended to be a true following of the teachings of a good man. However, I do think that it was corrupted rather quickly. It's pretty sad.
False.
Looking back at the early years (prior to Constantine in the 3rd Century) you would be hard pressed to prove your case that they had any ';power and control'; over the masses.
False... The teaching of Jesus were originally about love and compassion.
But... The Christian faith was derailed by Constatine and the Council of Nicea in 312 AD. It became the state religion and was then used to gain power and control the masses.
So, not originally, but later on.
Originally? No, Christ wanted love not power control
Historically? Yes, because people wanted power
Spiritually? No, because it speaks for another world
Socially? Yes, because it affected the whole world
Money Power? Yes and No
Have you met the masses? Nobody wants to control them. They are dolts... Their assets and finances on the other hand....
100% TRUE!
True
totally false.
False. It was a way to get persecuted and tortured by the Roman regime who regarded their emporer as a god.
True because it was the Romans who came up with Christianity an their whole means wus world domination they heard of Jesus in they're conquest of Africa an used it to their advantage over the weak minded
False. In Antioch, when the term was first used, Christians were a tiny and persecuted Semitic minority. It is quite unlikely they were under any illusion that any time in their own lifetimes there'd be any ';masses'; to ';control.';True or False: Christianity was originally created as a way to gain power and control the masses?
Well, if that was the case, it was a complete failure (for anyone involved in its conception).
Every apostle (including Paul) except John were murdered for their beliefs. Christians were being killed even while the New Testament was still being written. Power? Only if being thrown into prison, whipped, beaten, and finally murdered is power.
It also was certainly not created as a way to control the masses. Judaism did a much better job of that than Christianity. If anything, it was created as a way loose all power, but to free the masses!
Therefore, 100% FALSE!
Just like every other religion.
False
False
I,m a non-religious history nut. I never got that impression from the hundreds of history books that I've read. What was your source ?
I don't know about ';originally';. It may have been created as a mystery religion for the Hebrews, like the many other extant mystery religions of the era, but then was changed into a literal form and used to gain power and control the masses. I'm not sure we'll ever know for sure exactly how it began, since the Roman Catholic Church did its best to eradicate any and all documents that contradicted the ';official'; version.
TRUE!!! It is still being used in that manner.
True
Totally true. Created to gain power, control the masses and blackmail the lands and money from the people.
True all the way!!!!!!!!
The first 3 centuries of Christianity shows they were brutally persecuted. The first 30 popes were martyred.
And you call that a way to gain power and control masses? If anything, in todays world the real ';gaining power and control masses'; is the Dictator of Moral Relativism, which is diametrically opposed to Christianity.
Where did you come up with an idea like that? False.
False. I think that, at the very beginning, it was intended to be a true following of the teachings of a good man. However, I do think that it was corrupted rather quickly. It's pretty sad.
False.
Looking back at the early years (prior to Constantine in the 3rd Century) you would be hard pressed to prove your case that they had any ';power and control'; over the masses.
False... The teaching of Jesus were originally about love and compassion.
But... The Christian faith was derailed by Constatine and the Council of Nicea in 312 AD. It became the state religion and was then used to gain power and control the masses.
So, not originally, but later on.
Originally? No, Christ wanted love not power control
Historically? Yes, because people wanted power
Spiritually? No, because it speaks for another world
Socially? Yes, because it affected the whole world
Money Power? Yes and No
Have you met the masses? Nobody wants to control them. They are dolts... Their assets and finances on the other hand....
100% TRUE!
True
totally false.
False. It was a way to get persecuted and tortured by the Roman regime who regarded their emporer as a god.
True because it was the Romans who came up with Christianity an their whole means wus world domination they heard of Jesus in they're conquest of Africa an used it to their advantage over the weak minded
True or False, Galileo got in trouble for declaring that the sun circles Earth.?
False:
His statements went against scripture and the doctrine of the church.
In 1613, just as Galileo published his Letters on the Solar Spots, an openly Copernican writing, the first attack came from a Dominican friar and professor of ecclesiastical history in Florence, Father Lorini. Preaching on All Soul's Day, Lorini said that Copernican doctrine violated Scripture, which clearly places Earth, and not the Sun at the center of the universe. What, if Copernicus were right, would be the sense of Joshua 10:13 which says ';So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven'; or Isaiah 40:22 that speaks of ';the heavens stretched out as a curtain'; above ';the circle of the earth';? Pressured later to apologize for his attack, Lorini later said that he ';said a couple of words to the effect that the doctrine of Ipernicus [sic], or whatever his name is, was against Holy Scripture.';True or False, Galileo got in trouble for declaring that the sun circles Earth.?
False. He got in trouble by saying that the model of celestial spheres was wrong, the church was already geocentric at that time, but could have tolerated heliocentrism...it was the claim that the planets are not held in place by invisible spheres that caused trouble.True or False, Galileo got in trouble for declaring that the sun circles Earth.?
That is Poppycock! Galileo got in trouble for declaring that the earth circled the sun.
3 days of study would solve all trigonometric and Galilean questions
False.He got in trouble saying the Earth orbits the sun.
False. He got in trouble for saying the earth circles the sun.
His statements went against scripture and the doctrine of the church.
In 1613, just as Galileo published his Letters on the Solar Spots, an openly Copernican writing, the first attack came from a Dominican friar and professor of ecclesiastical history in Florence, Father Lorini. Preaching on All Soul's Day, Lorini said that Copernican doctrine violated Scripture, which clearly places Earth, and not the Sun at the center of the universe. What, if Copernicus were right, would be the sense of Joshua 10:13 which says ';So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven'; or Isaiah 40:22 that speaks of ';the heavens stretched out as a curtain'; above ';the circle of the earth';? Pressured later to apologize for his attack, Lorini later said that he ';said a couple of words to the effect that the doctrine of Ipernicus [sic], or whatever his name is, was against Holy Scripture.';True or False, Galileo got in trouble for declaring that the sun circles Earth.?
False. He got in trouble by saying that the model of celestial spheres was wrong, the church was already geocentric at that time, but could have tolerated heliocentrism...it was the claim that the planets are not held in place by invisible spheres that caused trouble.True or False, Galileo got in trouble for declaring that the sun circles Earth.?
That is Poppycock! Galileo got in trouble for declaring that the earth circled the sun.
3 days of study would solve all trigonometric and Galilean questions
False.He got in trouble saying the Earth orbits the sun.
False. He got in trouble for saying the earth circles the sun.
True or False: All the hott people hang out in P&S?
guilty as charged
'this is why, this is why im hot...im hot cause i hang in P%26amp;S.'True or False: All the hott people hang out in P%26amp;S?
True. We're all bangin' =]
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;…True or False: All the hott people hang out in P%26amp;S?
That is definitely true! P%26amp;S is where you'll find the sexiest and awesomest people ever.
:D
true remember you me and our contacts and everyone that answered this is are all on P%26amp;S
TRUE!!, No onther category can beat us! We are all smokin hot, plus this category has more people that actually put up there real photo!! Not the stupid cartoon avatars!
False, I'm here. I should be exiled to R%26amp;S for a couple of days. ';Reincarnated'; as a grey smiley. =/
Probably lol
Hell Yeah!
Especially Manny.
Very True.
:D
Very true. :)
True!
:]
TRUE
True everyone is hot here!
Tottaly True.. im guilty to charge!!
[= haha
Hmm...true..XD
true
true
DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH of course [:
You bet (:
True! wait am I considered hott..oh gosh *blushes*
true..
p%26amp;s users are the best users =)
I agree with the first answer on we're the best, but I don't consider myself to be hot.
yeah but half are pedofiles =O
KIDDING
or am i? ;)
looks that way:)
shut up will..you know your hot:P
yeah since i came to this section
totally true.. but i thimk u rule over this lol
true. You guys rocked!
whoops i meant rock ;P
of course. why else would we be here(: ;]
False, unless I'm hanging out there. ;)
EDIT: 10 Thumbs down? Wow, I knew I was seriously ugly but I didn't think it was a unanimous opinion.
No the hot people are in P%26amp;S... the hott people hang out in beauty and style.
I'm sure there are hot people that don't hang out in P%26amp;S but hang out in other sections instead.
'this is why, this is why im hot...im hot cause i hang in P%26amp;S.'True or False: All the hott people hang out in P%26amp;S?
True. We're all bangin' =]
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;…True or False: All the hott people hang out in P%26amp;S?
That is definitely true! P%26amp;S is where you'll find the sexiest and awesomest people ever.
:D
true remember you me and our contacts and everyone that answered this is are all on P%26amp;S
TRUE!!, No onther category can beat us! We are all smokin hot, plus this category has more people that actually put up there real photo!! Not the stupid cartoon avatars!
False, I'm here. I should be exiled to R%26amp;S for a couple of days. ';Reincarnated'; as a grey smiley. =/
Probably lol
Hell Yeah!
Especially Manny.
Very True.
:D
Very true. :)
True!
:]
TRUE
True everyone is hot here!
Tottaly True.. im guilty to charge!!
[= haha
Hmm...true..XD
true
true
DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH of course [:
You bet (:
True! wait am I considered hott..oh gosh *blushes*
true..
p%26amp;s users are the best users =)
I agree with the first answer on we're the best, but I don't consider myself to be hot.
yeah but half are pedofiles =O
KIDDING
or am i? ;)
looks that way:)
shut up will..you know your hot:P
yeah since i came to this section
totally true.. but i thimk u rule over this lol
true. You guys rocked!
whoops i meant rock ;P
of course. why else would we be here(: ;]
False, unless I'm hanging out there. ;)
EDIT: 10 Thumbs down? Wow, I knew I was seriously ugly but I didn't think it was a unanimous opinion.
No the hot people are in P%26amp;S... the hott people hang out in beauty and style.
I'm sure there are hot people that don't hang out in P%26amp;S but hang out in other sections instead.
True or false about a girls body after sex?
is it true that after a girl has sex that she stops growing? I am almost 17 years old and my boobs are like small i am a 34b or a in bra size! Another question.... What are ways to make my boob bigger without any surgeries and with out needing to use push u bras[[ any exercises or other ways to naturally make them grow]]True or false about a girls body after sex?
Sex has nothing do to with growth, other than if you get pregnant. In that case, you will expand outwards. Otherwise, you continue to grow until you reach your genetically determined height. Your boobs are about as big as they are likely to get by now, and short of surgery or a pushup/padded bra, you aren't going to get any bigger. You can do exercises for the chest muscles, but honestly that's not going to boost you a cup size. Your breast size, like your height, is a matter of genetics primarily. Best to learn to like the size you are, than be worried about it. You are a great deal more than the sum of the size of your bra cups. It doesn't matter what size they are, they will work for their intended purpose, and Mr. Right won't care what size they are. True or false about a girls body after sex?
No you don't stop growing after sex. i've never heard that one before. i think you'll find that your boobs will grow once you leave school. I was small all the way through high school and then once i turned 18/19 they shot out. it depends for every person, but i'm sure they will grow a lot more when you turn 18/19
girl, your boobs are not small. I have a small boob, and i dont even want to mention it..lol. boobs stop growing by the age 17-19...i wish my boobs would grow too and i'm already 20..so its too late for that already.. darn! anyway, the answer to your question...NO that is not true.
that's a good question and i've always wonder the same thing
I'm 16 and have the same problem and I'm a 36b and i don't know if that's normal for my age
rubbish. no connection between growth and sex. for bigger boob eat health , fat items and do exercise . 34 is o.k. for your age.
Do you think chicks who have sex when they're 13 stay like that for the rest of their lives?
As for boobs, i dunno. Just be happy with what you have.
That the dumbest rumor Ive ever heard.
It has nothing to do with anything.
Birthcontrol, weightgain, and pregnancy are really the only things that make your boobs grow.
No, it isn't true, and I've heard of excersizes that supposedly increase the bustline but I doubt they work.
noo thats not true...
and the only way to make your boobs bigger without surgery is to put on weight, but then your whole body will look bigger aswell
ummm no thats another stupid rumor as far as i know and about them growing idk just don't use any pills off the internet or you might end up with ripleys believe it or not boobs lol
ive never heard that about sex... seems ridicolous... try takin birth control when i started it around 17 or 18 my boobs got much bigger pretty quick
False! There's no way to naturally make them grow, but mine didn't fully grow til I was about 21.
Thats false... There is no way to make your boobs bigger without surgery.long hair styles
Sex has nothing do to with growth, other than if you get pregnant. In that case, you will expand outwards. Otherwise, you continue to grow until you reach your genetically determined height. Your boobs are about as big as they are likely to get by now, and short of surgery or a pushup/padded bra, you aren't going to get any bigger. You can do exercises for the chest muscles, but honestly that's not going to boost you a cup size. Your breast size, like your height, is a matter of genetics primarily. Best to learn to like the size you are, than be worried about it. You are a great deal more than the sum of the size of your bra cups. It doesn't matter what size they are, they will work for their intended purpose, and Mr. Right won't care what size they are. True or false about a girls body after sex?
No you don't stop growing after sex. i've never heard that one before. i think you'll find that your boobs will grow once you leave school. I was small all the way through high school and then once i turned 18/19 they shot out. it depends for every person, but i'm sure they will grow a lot more when you turn 18/19
girl, your boobs are not small. I have a small boob, and i dont even want to mention it..lol. boobs stop growing by the age 17-19...i wish my boobs would grow too and i'm already 20..so its too late for that already.. darn! anyway, the answer to your question...NO that is not true.
that's a good question and i've always wonder the same thing
I'm 16 and have the same problem and I'm a 36b and i don't know if that's normal for my age
rubbish. no connection between growth and sex. for bigger boob eat health , fat items and do exercise . 34 is o.k. for your age.
Do you think chicks who have sex when they're 13 stay like that for the rest of their lives?
As for boobs, i dunno. Just be happy with what you have.
That the dumbest rumor Ive ever heard.
It has nothing to do with anything.
Birthcontrol, weightgain, and pregnancy are really the only things that make your boobs grow.
No, it isn't true, and I've heard of excersizes that supposedly increase the bustline but I doubt they work.
noo thats not true...
and the only way to make your boobs bigger without surgery is to put on weight, but then your whole body will look bigger aswell
ummm no thats another stupid rumor as far as i know and about them growing idk just don't use any pills off the internet or you might end up with ripleys believe it or not boobs lol
ive never heard that about sex... seems ridicolous... try takin birth control when i started it around 17 or 18 my boobs got much bigger pretty quick
False! There's no way to naturally make them grow, but mine didn't fully grow til I was about 21.
Thats false... There is no way to make your boobs bigger without surgery.
True or false: unfortunately, many automated processes generate costs that have no cause and effect?
relationship with volume-based cost driversTrue or false: unfortunately, many automated processes generate costs that have no cause and effect?
I have seen this many times in Industry because of
various intermittent problems with machinery...
My job is to maintain the machinery in a number of places.
The nature of the problems cannot be determined and so
these problems are ';of unknown cause';. But also, the
';effect'; is not recognized because the corporate owners
do not wish to admit to lack of quality control for the product.
Consumers may notice and say nothing, and so the cycle
continues over and over.
I have seen this many times in Industry because of
various intermittent problems with machinery...
My job is to maintain the machinery in a number of places.
The nature of the problems cannot be determined and so
these problems are ';of unknown cause';. But also, the
';effect'; is not recognized because the corporate owners
do not wish to admit to lack of quality control for the product.
Consumers may notice and say nothing, and so the cycle
continues over and over.
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
True or False? a noticeable increase in thirst can be an indication of diabetes?
TrueTrue or False? a noticeable increase in thirst can be an indication of diabetes?
True.True or False? a noticeable increase in thirst can be an indication of diabetes?
True. There can be other causes too, but you should see your doctor ASAP.
TRUE, ALSO OTHER THINGS AS WELL , I WAS ON OPTI FAST DIET AND HAD INCREASED THIRST AND IT DIDN'T EVEN SAY IT IN THE WARNINGS, YOU CAN DO A COUPLE OF TESTS TO SEE IF YOU HAVE , I HOPE FOR YOUR SAKE YOU DON'T .
That is true.
true
True.True or False? a noticeable increase in thirst can be an indication of diabetes?
True. There can be other causes too, but you should see your doctor ASAP.
TRUE, ALSO OTHER THINGS AS WELL , I WAS ON OPTI FAST DIET AND HAD INCREASED THIRST AND IT DIDN'T EVEN SAY IT IN THE WARNINGS, YOU CAN DO A COUPLE OF TESTS TO SEE IF YOU HAVE , I HOPE FOR YOUR SAKE YOU DON'T .
That is true.
true
True or false: a cubic mile of sea water contains only water?
False
there are a ton of things in the ocean, animals, salt, oxygen, nitrogen, plantsTrue or false: a cubic mile of sea water contains only water?
False. It contains all sorts of things.
Small organisms
Salt
Air
The list goes onTrue or false: a cubic mile of sea water contains only water?
False.
there are a ton of things in the ocean, animals, salt, oxygen, nitrogen, plantsTrue or false: a cubic mile of sea water contains only water?
False. It contains all sorts of things.
Small organisms
Salt
Air
The list goes onTrue or false: a cubic mile of sea water contains only water?
False.
True or false most of the world's mountain ranges are composed of folded marine sediments.?
no its false because most of the mountain ranges are fomed due to the movement of paltes and then mountain ranges are formed and sediments are formed in shalow marine condition due to the weatherinTrue or false most of the world's mountain ranges are composed of folded marine sediments.?
False, most are igneous or metamorphic... Rockies, Andies, Himalayas
False, most are igneous or metamorphic... Rockies, Andies, Himalayas
True or false skew lines are coplanar and intersect?
Skew lines, by definition, are not on the same plane. If they intersected, then they would be on the same plane.
[ The previous answerer got these two backwards. It is possible for two lines on the same plane to not intersect.]True or false skew lines are coplanar and intersect?
Absolutely FALSE.
Skew lines by definition never intersect and thus cannot be in the same plane.
[ The previous answerer got these two backwards. It is possible for two lines on the same plane to not intersect.]True or false skew lines are coplanar and intersect?
Absolutely FALSE.
Skew lines by definition never intersect and thus cannot be in the same plane.
True or False. All atoms of alkaline earth elements have two valence electrons.?
True ,True, True, !!! its electron configuration,shows that all have 2 e in the valence outermost shells
4 Beryllium 2, 2
12 Magnesium 2, 8, 2
20 Calcium 2, 8, 8, 2
38 Strontium 2, 8, 18, 8, 2
56 Barium 2, 8, 18, 18, 8, 2
88 Radium 2, 8, 18, 32, 18, 8, 2True or False. All atoms of alkaline earth elements have two valence electrons.?
The alkaline earth elements form Group ll of the periodic table. Being in this group, they have 2 valency electrons on their outermost shell.
Statement is TRUETrue or False. All atoms of alkaline earth elements have two valence electrons.?
True, in their neutral states. They tend to ionize, however.
true.
falselong hair styles
4 Beryllium 2, 2
12 Magnesium 2, 8, 2
20 Calcium 2, 8, 8, 2
38 Strontium 2, 8, 18, 8, 2
56 Barium 2, 8, 18, 18, 8, 2
88 Radium 2, 8, 18, 32, 18, 8, 2True or False. All atoms of alkaline earth elements have two valence electrons.?
The alkaline earth elements form Group ll of the periodic table. Being in this group, they have 2 valency electrons on their outermost shell.
Statement is TRUETrue or False. All atoms of alkaline earth elements have two valence electrons.?
True, in their neutral states. They tend to ionize, however.
true.
false
True or False: Being a player is hard work?
If True, share your experience please.True or False: Being a player is hard work?
True...it's hard out there for a pimp.True or False: Being a player is hard work?
not!!
False it is not hard at all
what player in like a basketball player?
ah i get player being a sugar daddy of course its hard work and comprising my experience i met a lot of girls strippers bar girl gym girl etc..but i love all of them and i thank them...just be true
false its only hard for lazy dead-beats!!!!!!!!
sod
False:its supposed to be fun not hard work
But somebodys got to do it!
I have no idea the only thing I play is....
I have no idea?
I have no clue.. I am not a player..
true
for the players...must be
FALSE
True, Monopoly can be challenging, or did this question go over my head?
If it's true, then you're not a good player. A good player knows how to handle everything smoothly.
its so hard
so hard
so hard
a hard rain is gonna fall
True...it's hard out there for a pimp.True or False: Being a player is hard work?
not!!
False it is not hard at all
what player in like a basketball player?
ah i get player being a sugar daddy of course its hard work and comprising my experience i met a lot of girls strippers bar girl gym girl etc..but i love all of them and i thank them...just be true
false its only hard for lazy dead-beats!!!!!!!!
sod
False:its supposed to be fun not hard work
But somebodys got to do it!
I have no idea the only thing I play is....
I have no idea?
I have no clue.. I am not a player..
true
for the players...must be
FALSE
True, Monopoly can be challenging, or did this question go over my head?
If it's true, then you're not a good player. A good player knows how to handle everything smoothly.
its so hard
so hard
so hard
a hard rain is gonna fall
True or False - 10 points to best!?
The political influence and economic growth of the Arab nations is partly due to their control of large reserves of oil.
The nations of Latin America industrialized very rapidly after WWII.
Desertification and expanding populations have led to famine in many parts of Africa.
The student demonstrations in Tinananmen Square in 1989 succeeded in bringing about social and political reforms in China.True or False - 10 points to best!?
1) True, watch the news, 140 bucks a barrel of Oil, Billions of barrels each year....
2) False, although major cities are modrenizing this didn't happen rapidly after WWII. Still going through the process today
3) False.... However Destification has helped increase the numbers of people living in poverty and in famine.
4) False, China's policies had remained unaffected after the tianamen squre rallies. The event had not brotten social and political reforms. You can still see the same old china in the One Child Policy.True or False - 10 points to best!?
True
False
True
False...but improvements have been made. Things can still be improved...but I think China is slowly..improving.
True/False/True/Maybe
true.
but many died in tiananmen square. many............
true
false
false
false
true
The nations of Latin America industrialized very rapidly after WWII.
Desertification and expanding populations have led to famine in many parts of Africa.
The student demonstrations in Tinananmen Square in 1989 succeeded in bringing about social and political reforms in China.True or False - 10 points to best!?
1) True, watch the news, 140 bucks a barrel of Oil, Billions of barrels each year....
2) False, although major cities are modrenizing this didn't happen rapidly after WWII. Still going through the process today
3) False.... However Destification has helped increase the numbers of people living in poverty and in famine.
4) False, China's policies had remained unaffected after the tianamen squre rallies. The event had not brotten social and political reforms. You can still see the same old china in the One Child Policy.True or False - 10 points to best!?
True
False
True
False...but improvements have been made. Things can still be improved...but I think China is slowly..improving.
True/False/True/Maybe
true.
but many died in tiananmen square. many............
true
false
false
false
true
True or False? cobalt chloride contains two moles of cobalt ions for every one mole of cobal chloride?
please explainTrue or False? cobalt chloride contains two moles of cobalt ions for every one mole of cobal chloride?
I am assuming that you are referring to Co(II) Chloride or cobaltous chloride. The formula is CoCl2, which dissolves to one cobalt ion and 2 chloride ions. So, the answer is FALSE.
By the way, some chemists have claimed to make cobaltic chloride or CoCl3 or Co(III)Cl3.
Check with your teacher for more info but I think the given is cobaltous chloride. Hope this helps.
I am assuming that you are referring to Co(II) Chloride or cobaltous chloride. The formula is CoCl2, which dissolves to one cobalt ion and 2 chloride ions. So, the answer is FALSE.
By the way, some chemists have claimed to make cobaltic chloride or CoCl3 or Co(III)Cl3.
Check with your teacher for more info but I think the given is cobaltous chloride. Hope this helps.
True or false? A southern California mountain can have both desert and tundra?
Certainly, it can have both. The wetter side (west) would have the tundra. The dryer side (facing east) Would have the desert.True or false? A southern California mountain can have both desert and tundra?
Definitely. The upper part of the mountain can have the alpine tundra (more precipitation up high) and the desert can be down below (less precipitation below).True or false? A southern California mountain can have both desert and tundra?
true
Definitely. The upper part of the mountain can have the alpine tundra (more precipitation up high) and the desert can be down below (less precipitation below).True or false? A southern California mountain can have both desert and tundra?
true
True or False: You can always tell a person鈥檚 genotype from his/her phenotype.?
False...for example
In a person with brown eyes (which is their phenotype), you wouldn't know if their genotype (represented as B-dominant brown %26amp; b-recessive-blue)was BB or Bb. True or False: You can always tell a person鈥檚 genotype from his/her phenotype.?
That is definitely false because if your phenotype is sumthin like black
hair, the person can have both genotype Xx or XX assuming the black hair is dominantTrue or False: You can always tell a person鈥檚 genotype from his/her phenotype.?
If it is a recessive trait, yes because there is no other possiblillity.
If it is a dominant trait, no because they may be heterozygeous or homozygeous.
False.
You cannot detect recessive genes when the dominant phenotype is expressed.
false they mite hav a dominant allele that can be hetrozygous or homozygous
In a person with brown eyes (which is their phenotype), you wouldn't know if their genotype (represented as B-dominant brown %26amp; b-recessive-blue)was BB or Bb. True or False: You can always tell a person鈥檚 genotype from his/her phenotype.?
That is definitely false because if your phenotype is sumthin like black
hair, the person can have both genotype Xx or XX assuming the black hair is dominantTrue or False: You can always tell a person鈥檚 genotype from his/her phenotype.?
If it is a recessive trait, yes because there is no other possiblillity.
If it is a dominant trait, no because they may be heterozygeous or homozygeous.
False.
You cannot detect recessive genes when the dominant phenotype is expressed.
false they mite hav a dominant allele that can be hetrozygous or homozygous
A friend says dentists refer you to a specialist for root canals as a way to scam prices. True or False?
False--you will want an endodontist (root canal specialist) to do a root canal. They go to regular dental school plus a few more years to be a specialist. They are generally faster at doing root canals %26amp; have better equipment for it. The general dentist I work for does SOME root canals, but if it looks difficult, she'll refer them out. I disagree with Dragonfly's answer to root canals are caused by ';sloppy'; dentistry. Most people need root canals because the cavity has gotten so large that it has reached the nerve of the tooth. A few times a week at my office, we will do a filling on a tooth %26amp; let the patient know that the tooth may need a root canal in the future. Every tooth reacts different to a cavity being that close to the nerve. Some people may not need one, others will notice right away that the nerve is dying, while others can go 15 years %26amp; then the tooth starts to die from the large decay that was there. Think about it this way: if you needed some kind of surgery, wouldn't you rather have a specialist do it or just your general doctor?A friend says dentists refer you to a specialist for root canals as a way to scam prices. True or False?
No, you really do need a specialist to do the root canal.
However, the big scam is WHY you need a root canal. It's often due to a faulty filling or a filling put in a cavity that still had enough bacteria in it to rot your tooth under that filling. That is the big scam--root canals are caused by sloppy dentists.A friend says dentists refer you to a specialist for root canals as a way to scam prices. True or False?
I have had 2 root canals and they have both been done by a specialist, painless.
I live in the UK and my dentist does all the root canal
treatment himself.But my dentist is a dental surgeon, and I
have been told that qualifications have to be gained to do
this kind of work.
No, you really do need a specialist to do the root canal.
However, the big scam is WHY you need a root canal. It's often due to a faulty filling or a filling put in a cavity that still had enough bacteria in it to rot your tooth under that filling. That is the big scam--root canals are caused by sloppy dentists.A friend says dentists refer you to a specialist for root canals as a way to scam prices. True or False?
I have had 2 root canals and they have both been done by a specialist, painless.
I live in the UK and my dentist does all the root canal
treatment himself.But my dentist is a dental surgeon, and I
have been told that qualifications have to be gained to do
this kind of work.
True or False';Great vessels are those that directly come from of go into the heart.?
Well from my training in cardiovascular medicine. The answer would be true with a caveat.
Blue blood vessels, the inferior and superior vena cava taking deoxygenated blood to the right heart which is pumped through the Pulmonary Artery to the lungs to turn into oxygenated red blood in the lungs alveolar/capillary network and returned via the Pulmonary veins (of which there are four) that dump into the left heart, specifically the left atrium. Then pumped out the left ventricle to the greatest of vessels to the body via the Aorta.
So you have this list of the great vessels:
Superior and Invferior Vena Cava
Pulmonary Artery (which splits into the right and left to go to each respective lung)
4 Pulmonary veins (all just dump into the left atrium, 2 from each lung)
Aorta.
Great vessels can also refer mainly to the pumonary artery and aorta which can be transposed at birth in an embryological mishap which is the most common use of the term ';great vessels'; called of course, transposition of the great vessels referring almost exlusively to the pulmonary artery and aorta in the commonest form but can mean any of the vessels listed above.. Soooo, the term great vessels includes all the vessels that go into and out of the heart with the exceptions of the coronary sinus and coronary arteries which supply blood flow to the heart itself. They are great indeed, coronary arteries if clogged cause heart attacks. But great vessels are what the heart dangles from basically, not referring to its own blood circulation. So it could be construed as a bit of a trick question or poorly written as the coronary arteries and coronary sinus go into and out of the heart. Well the coronary arteries come off within millimeters of the take of the aorta.
Hope that helps,
James P.True or False';Great vessels are those that directly come from of go into the heart.?
great vessels is such an ambiguous term!
directly into and out of your heart are:
right atrium: vena cava (superior, inferior)
right ventricle: pulmonary artery
left atrium: pulmonary vein
left ventrical: aorta
i guess TRUE because those seem pretty great to me!True or False';Great vessels are those that directly come from of go into the heart.?
Huh- I always thought ';great vessels'; are the large ones, the aorta, and the vena cava. So, not all the vessels mentioned would be ';great';.
Maybe you should try wiki or one of the family doc sites!
true--aorta, superior vena caeva and inferior vena caeva
Blue blood vessels, the inferior and superior vena cava taking deoxygenated blood to the right heart which is pumped through the Pulmonary Artery to the lungs to turn into oxygenated red blood in the lungs alveolar/capillary network and returned via the Pulmonary veins (of which there are four) that dump into the left heart, specifically the left atrium. Then pumped out the left ventricle to the greatest of vessels to the body via the Aorta.
So you have this list of the great vessels:
Superior and Invferior Vena Cava
Pulmonary Artery (which splits into the right and left to go to each respective lung)
4 Pulmonary veins (all just dump into the left atrium, 2 from each lung)
Aorta.
Great vessels can also refer mainly to the pumonary artery and aorta which can be transposed at birth in an embryological mishap which is the most common use of the term ';great vessels'; called of course, transposition of the great vessels referring almost exlusively to the pulmonary artery and aorta in the commonest form but can mean any of the vessels listed above.. Soooo, the term great vessels includes all the vessels that go into and out of the heart with the exceptions of the coronary sinus and coronary arteries which supply blood flow to the heart itself. They are great indeed, coronary arteries if clogged cause heart attacks. But great vessels are what the heart dangles from basically, not referring to its own blood circulation. So it could be construed as a bit of a trick question or poorly written as the coronary arteries and coronary sinus go into and out of the heart. Well the coronary arteries come off within millimeters of the take of the aorta.
Hope that helps,
James P.True or False';Great vessels are those that directly come from of go into the heart.?
great vessels is such an ambiguous term!
directly into and out of your heart are:
right atrium: vena cava (superior, inferior)
right ventricle: pulmonary artery
left atrium: pulmonary vein
left ventrical: aorta
i guess TRUE because those seem pretty great to me!True or False';Great vessels are those that directly come from of go into the heart.?
Huh- I always thought ';great vessels'; are the large ones, the aorta, and the vena cava. So, not all the vessels mentioned would be ';great';.
Maybe you should try wiki or one of the family doc sites!
true--aorta, superior vena caeva and inferior vena caeva
True or false? : Chromosomes and genes both undergo segregation during meiosis?
Chromosomes and genes both undergo segregation during meiosis
True or false?
bit of an explanation please if possible woulddd be great :)True or false? : Chromosomes and genes both undergo segregation during meiosis?
True both undergo segregation during meiosis, as genes are part of chromosomes.
True or false?
bit of an explanation please if possible woulddd be great :)True or false? : Chromosomes and genes both undergo segregation during meiosis?
True both undergo segregation during meiosis, as genes are part of chromosomes.
True or false skin is the body's largest organ?
True!True or false skin is the body's largest organ?
True. And I'll drink a large glass of cold water to that!True or false skin is the body's largest organ?
true dont let anybody tell you otherwise
TRUE!!! :)
True
TRUE
true duh
True. And I'll drink a large glass of cold water to that!True or false skin is the body's largest organ?
true dont let anybody tell you otherwise
TRUE!!! :)
True
TRUE
true duh
True or False : Congress can never effectively overturn a U.S. Supreme Court decision by amending a statute.?
If congress changes a law, the Supreme Court decision still stands, because the law only applies to this point forward. ';Ex Post Facto'; laws are illegal. You can bring new cases to be tried under the new law, but it won't overturn the decision of the Supremes.
You can't arrest me for parking on the south side of the street a month ago, if you only enacted the law that made it illegal last week. When I did it, it was legal. You can change the law, but you can't make what I did before the law illegal.True or False : Congress can never effectively overturn a U.S. Supreme Court decision by amending a statute.?
I think the key phrase here is “effectively overturn,” meaning to overturn in effect or in application. In that case I believe the statement to be false because a statute declared unconstitutional may be so because of some element that the court objects to. If that element is removed by amending the law, the courts decision is “effectively” overturned even though it stands in the record in relation to the law in its original form.True or False : Congress can never effectively overturn a U.S. Supreme Court decision by amending a statute.?
False: The Supreme Court often interprets the ';intent of Congress'; when making a decision. If Congress passes new legislation making something explicitly clear, then that trumps the Supremes. The court might come back with the decision that the whole thing is unconstitutional.
You can't arrest me for parking on the south side of the street a month ago, if you only enacted the law that made it illegal last week. When I did it, it was legal. You can change the law, but you can't make what I did before the law illegal.True or False : Congress can never effectively overturn a U.S. Supreme Court decision by amending a statute.?
I think the key phrase here is “effectively overturn,” meaning to overturn in effect or in application. In that case I believe the statement to be false because a statute declared unconstitutional may be so because of some element that the court objects to. If that element is removed by amending the law, the courts decision is “effectively” overturned even though it stands in the record in relation to the law in its original form.True or False : Congress can never effectively overturn a U.S. Supreme Court decision by amending a statute.?
False: The Supreme Court often interprets the ';intent of Congress'; when making a decision. If Congress passes new legislation making something explicitly clear, then that trumps the Supremes. The court might come back with the decision that the whole thing is unconstitutional.
True or false history question?
Majority whips are chosen by a majority vote of the total membership in each respective house.
True
FalseTrue or false history question?
FalseTrue or false history question?
False. Majority Whips are the second highest-ranking individual in the minority party.
false Only the majority political party votes and the majority rules on whom the majority whip will become.
False
Majority whips are chosen by the majority vote of the majority party of the respective house.
False. They are chosed by the party that is in the majority
false
False.
In the Senate, the Majority Whip is the third or fourth highest-ranking individual in the majority party (the party with the greater number of legislators in a legislative body). The Majority Whip is outranked by the Majority Leader, the President Pro Tempore and, if the majority also holds the executive branch, the President of the Senate. Because the office of President Pro Tempore is largely honorific, usually given to the senior senator of the majority, and the President of the Senate only acts in cases of a tie, the Majority Leader holds considerably more power than his or her House counterpart and so by extension an argument could be made that the Majority Whip is the second ranking individual in terms of actual power. Similarly, in the House the Majority Whip is outranked by both the Majority Leader and the Speaker.
In both the House and the Senate, the Minority Whip is the second highest-ranking individual in the minority party (the party with the lesser number of legislators in a legislative body), outranked only by the Minority Leader.long hair styles
True
FalseTrue or false history question?
FalseTrue or false history question?
False. Majority Whips are the second highest-ranking individual in the minority party.
false Only the majority political party votes and the majority rules on whom the majority whip will become.
False
Majority whips are chosen by the majority vote of the majority party of the respective house.
False. They are chosed by the party that is in the majority
false
False.
In the Senate, the Majority Whip is the third or fourth highest-ranking individual in the majority party (the party with the greater number of legislators in a legislative body). The Majority Whip is outranked by the Majority Leader, the President Pro Tempore and, if the majority also holds the executive branch, the President of the Senate. Because the office of President Pro Tempore is largely honorific, usually given to the senior senator of the majority, and the President of the Senate only acts in cases of a tie, the Majority Leader holds considerably more power than his or her House counterpart and so by extension an argument could be made that the Majority Whip is the second ranking individual in terms of actual power. Similarly, in the House the Majority Whip is outranked by both the Majority Leader and the Speaker.
In both the House and the Senate, the Minority Whip is the second highest-ranking individual in the minority party (the party with the lesser number of legislators in a legislative body), outranked only by the Minority Leader.
True or false? The terms “aerobic fitness” and “cardio-respiratory fitness” mean the same thing.?
Pretty much the same thing, I'd say. One sounds like someone trying to be too clever, the other is more a buzzphrase for personal trainers.True or false? The terms “aerobic fitness” and “cardio-respiratory fitness” mean the same thing.?
when i got my fitness specialist cert., cardio-resp. fit. meant pulse/breathing rate...while aerobic fit. meant the vox uptake-how much oxygen ws actually being absorbed by the blood from the alveoli...good luck.
when i got my fitness specialist cert., cardio-resp. fit. meant pulse/breathing rate...while aerobic fit. meant the vox uptake-how much oxygen ws actually being absorbed by the blood from the alveoli...good luck.
True or False Poll: You can pick your friends but you can't pick your family?
And do you like everyone in your family? Ever think of just NOT talking to a family member anymore?True or False Poll: You can pick your friends but you can't pick your family?
It is true that you can pick your friends but you can't pick your family. However, not all family members act like family all of the time and if the family member is that crappy towards me, I not only think of not talking to a family member anymore, I actually don't talk to them unless they shape up.True or False Poll: You can pick your friends but you can't pick your family?
True, i never had a prob with my family , but i had experience from my mom family , who had a prob with family heritage, and even now she never talks to her brother and sister.. so sad really... how money can breaks family.
False.
I went friendless for years because I came up with the idea that my friends HAVE to be people I have everything in common with. Well, the friendless years ended that myth.
I've made friends with people I have little in common with, but who are nice people, and my life isn't so morbid and gloomy now. You have to take what friendships you can find.
FALSE: You pick your family before you incarnate in order to complete the lessons and complete the karma you have with those relatives. Everything is written in your Book of Life.
You can never pick your friends. A few years ago, I was forced to be friends with this girl who was really immature and thought herself the opposite. Worst year of my life. Hated Middle School. Still do. ((I'm still there....argh...)) Truth is, I'm better off alone. (howls)
-Kaylie
You can pick half of your family (by marriage), and can always choose to dissasociate with those who just are not family 'material'. And I have chosen to not talk with certain Ex-family members.
true you are stuck with the family they are yours no matter if you talk to them or not. friends on the other hand you can pick and choose who you hang out with.
True.
Mostly, yes... but some of them are really BUGGING me right now.
Yes, but then, she's not talking to ME ';first.';
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
Now adays you can pick your family, unfortunately.
Anything is possible with the internet these days.
You could probably buy a new family on ebay.
um true
you can love but not like some family members
you can dislike and not love some you get thru marriage
but i guess if you show respect and grit your teeth and bite your tongue all's well
well you can chose who you marry and they become family
TRUE /NO/THINK I DON'T, POINT BLANK DO NOT TALK IF WE DO IT IS LIKE WAR...............TEMPER-MENTAL.........鈥?TURMOIL ............
True.
There are a few.
My older brother and I might talk once a year or so.
False ....you can pick family members. I am adopting my step daughter.
True...
true %26amp; yes:))d
I call my best friends my family. Having no siblings at all is just sad; that's why I always surround myself with people.
true and false
U dont get to pick ir parents or grandparents so on but ur wife u can choose
I love my parents. I don't talk to my brothers that much. I have what they call the ';middle child syndrome.';
I LOVE my mom and dad etc!!
they're my world!
True
It is true that you can pick your friends but you can't pick your family. However, not all family members act like family all of the time and if the family member is that crappy towards me, I not only think of not talking to a family member anymore, I actually don't talk to them unless they shape up.True or False Poll: You can pick your friends but you can't pick your family?
True, i never had a prob with my family , but i had experience from my mom family , who had a prob with family heritage, and even now she never talks to her brother and sister.. so sad really... how money can breaks family.
False.
I went friendless for years because I came up with the idea that my friends HAVE to be people I have everything in common with. Well, the friendless years ended that myth.
I've made friends with people I have little in common with, but who are nice people, and my life isn't so morbid and gloomy now. You have to take what friendships you can find.
FALSE: You pick your family before you incarnate in order to complete the lessons and complete the karma you have with those relatives. Everything is written in your Book of Life.
You can never pick your friends. A few years ago, I was forced to be friends with this girl who was really immature and thought herself the opposite. Worst year of my life. Hated Middle School. Still do. ((I'm still there....argh...)) Truth is, I'm better off alone. (howls)
-Kaylie
You can pick half of your family (by marriage), and can always choose to dissasociate with those who just are not family 'material'. And I have chosen to not talk with certain Ex-family members.
true you are stuck with the family they are yours no matter if you talk to them or not. friends on the other hand you can pick and choose who you hang out with.
True.
Mostly, yes... but some of them are really BUGGING me right now.
Yes, but then, she's not talking to ME ';first.';
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
Now adays you can pick your family, unfortunately.
Anything is possible with the internet these days.
You could probably buy a new family on ebay.
um true
you can love but not like some family members
you can dislike and not love some you get thru marriage
but i guess if you show respect and grit your teeth and bite your tongue all's well
well you can chose who you marry and they become family
TRUE /NO/THINK I DON'T, POINT BLANK DO NOT TALK IF WE DO IT IS LIKE WAR...............TEMPER-MENTAL.........鈥?TURMOIL ............
True.
There are a few.
My older brother and I might talk once a year or so.
False ....you can pick family members. I am adopting my step daughter.
True...
true %26amp; yes:))d
I call my best friends my family. Having no siblings at all is just sad; that's why I always surround myself with people.
true and false
U dont get to pick ir parents or grandparents so on but ur wife u can choose
I love my parents. I don't talk to my brothers that much. I have what they call the ';middle child syndrome.';
I LOVE my mom and dad etc!!
they're my world!
True
True or false,and explain,please,thank you?
One interpretation of depreciation and amortization is that it is a fixed cost of the firm. true or false?True or false,and explain,please,thank you?
It is a fixed cost that depreciates over a said period of time, and thus can be amortized during that specific time period.True or false,and explain,please,thank you?
true because it doesnt change with changes in revenue or sales.
It is a fixed cost that depreciates over a said period of time, and thus can be amortized during that specific time period.True or false,and explain,please,thank you?
true because it doesnt change with changes in revenue or sales.
True or False- If you don't fight the enemy on their land, they will come and attack you on yours?
again...iraq was not responsible for 911.True or False- If you don't fight the enemy on their land, they will come and attack you on yours?
That cannot be answered as true or false.
Depends on how paranoid the enemy is about you coming to invade first.True or False- If you don't fight the enemy on their land, they will come and attack you on yours?
Depends. In most cases it is true
That is as a rule true. The catch to the question is, is the ';enemy'; really your enemy or a perceived enemy? Given the man power, supplies, money and other resources your enemy will always come to fight you if they can. It's always best to go when you have the upper hand, before they end up getting it. =)
I thought they did? I guess I am mis-informed.
FACT. TRUE. Liberals believe that if we just talk to them they will stop hating us.
False. They come to your land to fight you when they can't get you off their land by any other means.
Depends on the enemies' means ... There is no chance that Afghanistan, Iran, Syria and the like would be able to fight a war on US of A territory
Absolute truth; the 9/11 event prooved it.
Thank you for the strategic advice, my dear. Upon enslaving your planet I can promise you your servitude to me will be most enjoyable, given time.
True enough, that is why I was getting work related nastygrams on my personal email account.
Did 9/11 teach you the answer to this? Before we went on the offensive, we were getting bombed everywhere!! Now, we have it contained to an area the size of two mid sized states halfway accross the world.
George Bush thinks so.
TRUE
True.
Take an 'A' for the day.
Now, move to the head of the class.
False. But it depends on who the enemy is and what counrty they might attack.
Yes, that is true. The best defense is always a good offense.
False. The Native Americans had no design in attacking Europe. Ireland had no designs on attacking England. Iraq had no designs on attacking the USA. The Aztecs had no designs on attacking Spain. The French had no designs on attacking Germany.The list goes on and on.
true look at the invasion of Hawaii from japan. that was unexpected.
rhetorical and designed to be inflammatory. i don't think Saddam could have mounted too much of an offense.
false
Eventually yes.
That is False. But we are breeding terrorists for generations to come, by attacking the wrong country, the Republicans might make that dream come true.
Who is the enemy again? Sunnis? Shia? Al-sadr? Saddam?
Haha, classic BS that's been used since the beginning of time.
Yes you're right, I'm sure Saddam was planning a massive invasion of America... good thing we nipped it in the bud and got over there to have our soldiers do their dyin eh?
True Failure to stop aggression of one county or in one country shows a week and venerable society thus if sufficient strength is gained by one they will look for who is seen as weak and the attack is on. Look at how WWI and WWII began and you will see how this has happened in the past and by all indication will happen again. If you don't fight to protect what you have you are sending a message to the world that you really don't care about what you have.
That cannot be answered as true or false.
Depends on how paranoid the enemy is about you coming to invade first.True or False- If you don't fight the enemy on their land, they will come and attack you on yours?
Depends. In most cases it is true
That is as a rule true. The catch to the question is, is the ';enemy'; really your enemy or a perceived enemy? Given the man power, supplies, money and other resources your enemy will always come to fight you if they can. It's always best to go when you have the upper hand, before they end up getting it. =)
I thought they did? I guess I am mis-informed.
FACT. TRUE. Liberals believe that if we just talk to them they will stop hating us.
False. They come to your land to fight you when they can't get you off their land by any other means.
Depends on the enemies' means ... There is no chance that Afghanistan, Iran, Syria and the like would be able to fight a war on US of A territory
Absolute truth; the 9/11 event prooved it.
Thank you for the strategic advice, my dear. Upon enslaving your planet I can promise you your servitude to me will be most enjoyable, given time.
True enough, that is why I was getting work related nastygrams on my personal email account.
Did 9/11 teach you the answer to this? Before we went on the offensive, we were getting bombed everywhere!! Now, we have it contained to an area the size of two mid sized states halfway accross the world.
George Bush thinks so.
TRUE
True.
Take an 'A' for the day.
Now, move to the head of the class.
False. But it depends on who the enemy is and what counrty they might attack.
Yes, that is true. The best defense is always a good offense.
False. The Native Americans had no design in attacking Europe. Ireland had no designs on attacking England. Iraq had no designs on attacking the USA. The Aztecs had no designs on attacking Spain. The French had no designs on attacking Germany.The list goes on and on.
true look at the invasion of Hawaii from japan. that was unexpected.
rhetorical and designed to be inflammatory. i don't think Saddam could have mounted too much of an offense.
false
Eventually yes.
That is False. But we are breeding terrorists for generations to come, by attacking the wrong country, the Republicans might make that dream come true.
Who is the enemy again? Sunnis? Shia? Al-sadr? Saddam?
Haha, classic BS that's been used since the beginning of time.
Yes you're right, I'm sure Saddam was planning a massive invasion of America... good thing we nipped it in the bud and got over there to have our soldiers do their dyin eh?
True Failure to stop aggression of one county or in one country shows a week and venerable society thus if sufficient strength is gained by one they will look for who is seen as weak and the attack is on. Look at how WWI and WWII began and you will see how this has happened in the past and by all indication will happen again. If you don't fight to protect what you have you are sending a message to the world that you really don't care about what you have.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)